Comparing minimally invasive and proactive initial management of extremely preterm infants

A Lando1, K Kure Østergaard, G Greisen

  • 1Department of Neonatology, The Juliane Marie Centre, University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Insights

A proactive approach to infant care for premature babies born before 26 weeks gestation did not increase psychomotor deficits. While mechanical ventilation use rose, survival rates showed a positive trend.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal care
  • Pediatric development

Background:

  • Minimally invasive care policies for extremely premature infants were standard.
  • A shift to a proactive approach, including delivery room intubation and surfactant, was implemented in 2005.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of a policy change towards proactive initial care for infants born before 26 weeks gestation.
  • To assess effects on neurodevelopmental outcomes, mortality, and respiratory support.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study analyzing Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) scores, mortality rates, and mechanical ventilation use.
  • Data collected before (1999-2003) and after (2005-2011) the policy change.

Main Results:

  • No significant increase in psychomotor deficits (ASQ z-score <-2 SD) was observed (22% vs. 26%).
  • Mortality rates decreased from 46% to 36% (p=0.06).
  • Mechanical ventilation use increased significantly from 64% to 87% (p<0.0001).

Conclusions:

  • A proactive approach to initial care for extremely premature infants did not lead to a major increase in psychomotor deficits.
  • The policy change was associated with a trend towards improved survival and a significant increase in mechanical ventilation use.
Abstract