Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Changing ecosystem service values following technological change
Jordi Honey-Rosés1, Daniel W Schneider, Nicholas Brozović
1School of Community and Regional Planning, University of British Columbia, 1933 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada, jhoney@mail.ubc.ca.
Technology and urban ecosystem services are complementary, not substitutes. Integrating natural and built infrastructure enhances ecosystem service value, as seen in Barcelona, showing co-evolution with technological innovation.
Area of Science:
- Urban Ecology
- Ecosystem Services
- Environmental Technology
Background:
- Ecosystem services research traditionally focuses on natural areas, overlooking urban contexts and technological interactions.
- A prevailing view suggests technology can replace natural ecosystem services, particularly when engineered systems offer superior performance.
- Urban ecology and design increasingly explore integrating natural and built infrastructures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To challenge the notion of a trade-off between natural and technological capital in ecosystem services.
- To demonstrate the complementary relationship between technological advancements and ecosystem management.
- To investigate how technological change influences the value and co-evolution of urban ecosystem services.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of existing literature on ecosystem services and technological substitution.
- Case study analysis of Barcelona, Spain, focusing on water treatment technology integration.
- Assessment of the impact of engineered systems on the value of co-located ecosystem services.
Main Results:
- The study refutes the idea of an inevitable trade-off, finding technology and ecosystem management to be complementary.
- Barcelona's water treatment technology installation led to increased value of local ecosystem services.
- Complementarity between natural and built infrastructures persists even when ecosystems are directly impacted by technology.
Conclusions:
- Technological innovation and ecosystem management are mutually reinforcing, not mutually exclusive.
- The value of ecosystem services can co-evolve with new technologies, creating new opportunities for value harnessing.
- Urban engineered structures can increase reliance on, rather than diminish the importance of, ecosystem processes.
Related Concept Videos
Biodiversity and Human Values
The Soil Ecosystem
Ecological Disturbance
What is an Ecosystem?
Sustainable Development
Threats to Biodiversity
