Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

10:08
Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
Published on: August 12, 2019
13.6K
A cautionary note on ignoring polygenic background when mapping quantitative trait loci via recombinant congenic
1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University St. John's, NL, Canada.
Frontiers in Genetics
|April 26, 2014
Summary
Ignoring polygenic random effects in gene mapping severely inflates type I errors. A new bootstrap method for linear mixed models using recombinant congenic strains offers accurate control of error rates in genetic linkage analysis.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Statistical Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Gene mapping often involves testing numerous genetic loci for association with phenotypes.
- Complex genetic traits are frequently modeled using linear mixed models (LMMs) that account for major genes and polygenic background effects.
- Simplifying analyses by omitting the polygenic random effects term from LMMs is common but problematic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the detrimental impact of ignoring random effects on type I error rates in gene mapping.
- To introduce and validate a novel bootstrap procedure for genetic linkage analysis using recombinant congenic strains within an LMM framework.
- To provide a reliable alternative for controlling statistical errors in complex genetic trait analysis.
Main Methods:
- Simulation studies were conducted to assess type I error rates when random effects are omitted from LMMs.
- A new bootstrap procedure was developed for genetic linkage mapping with recombinant congenic strains under LMMs.
- The performance of the proposed bootstrap method was evaluated through simulations, comparing its error rates to nominal levels.
Main Results:
- Ignoring the random effects term in LMMs leads to unacceptably high type I error rates in gene mapping.
- The proposed bootstrap procedure demonstrated type I error rates close to nominal levels in simulations.
- Slight inflation of type I error rates was observed with the bootstrap method when the random effects variance was large.
Conclusions:
- Omitting polygenic random effects in genetic linkage analysis significantly compromises the control of type I errors.
- The novel bootstrap procedure offers a robust solution for accurate statistical inference in gene mapping with recombinant congenic strains.
- Researchers should be cautious about potential modeling issues when simple linear regression yields multiple significant linkage peaks, suggesting the need for LMMs.
Keywords:
bootstrapping mixed modelsignoring random effectsmapping quantitative trait locimisspecified genetic modelsrecombinant congenic strainsMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Dihybrid Crosses
61.3K
Overview
61.3K
Polygenic Traits
7.1K
7.1K
Polygenic Traits
58.4K
When more than one gene is responsible for a given phenotype, the trait is considered polygenic. Human height is a polygenic trait. Studies have uncovered hundreds of loci that influence height, and there are believed to be many more. Due to the high number of genes involved, as well as environmental and nutritional factors, height varies significantly within a given population. The distribution of height forms a bell-shaped curve, with relatively few individuals in the population at the...
58.4K
Multiple Allele Traits
32.7K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
32.7K
Epistasis
37.3K
In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
37.3K
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
138
The human genome is over 99.9% identical between individuals, yet genetic differences exist at millions of bases. The human genome contains approximately 3 million variant positions per individual, many of which are heterozygous, contributing to genetic diversity and individual traits. Genetic variations include single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions, deletions, and copy number variations (CNVs).SNPs, the most common variation, involve single-base changes in DNA. These can be...
138

