Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Utility of Amyloid Beta and Tau Positron Emission Tomography Scans for Identifying Early-Stage Neurodegenerative Changes in Former Professional Football Players and Healthy Controls: Results from the Brain Health Initiative.

Journal of neurotrauma·2026
Same author

[<sup>64</sup>Cu]Cu-Labeled αCD11b Diabody as a Novel PET Tracer for the Detection of Immunosuppression in Glioblastoma.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

On-Scanner Correction of Gradient Nonlinearity Bias for Accurate Assessment of Diffusion Heterogeneity Across Bone Sites in Myelofibrosis Patients.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same author

Brain volume trajectories in Down syndrome and autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Biomarkers.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Biomarkers.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same journal

Baseline value and longitudinal kinetics of circulating nucleosomes during neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: Results from a GINECO/GINEGEPS study of the randomized phase II CHIVA trial.

Translational oncology·2026
Same journal

Fractionated high-dose vitamin c sustains higher plasma trough concentrations in advanced solid tumors: a phase I clinical study.

Translational oncology·2026
Same journal

Mechanisms and advances of drug resistance in colorectal cancer: A systematic overview of multi-layered regulatory networks.

Translational oncology·2026
Same journal

Establishment of a clear cell renal cell carcinoma organoid cohort integrated into the UroCCR clinical database: A feasibility study.

Translational oncology·2026
Same journal

The YAP-TEAD4 inhibitor M511-0965 suppresses triple-negative breast cancer progression by downregulating TGFB2.

Translational oncology·2026
Same journal

Pan-cancer analysis identifies immunoproteasome as the predominant survival-associated component of antigen processing machinery.

Translational oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations
07:45

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations

Published on: September 28, 2018

8.7K

Errors in Quantitative Image Analysis due to Platform-Dependent Image Scaling.

Thomas L Chenevert1, Dariya I Malyarenko1, David Newitt2

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Translational Oncology
|April 29, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative image analysis software often fails to account for magnetic resonance imaging scanner-specific scaling. This leads to significant intensity measurement bias, impacting quantitative imaging accuracy.

More Related Videos

A New Technique for Quantitative Analysis of Hair Loss in Mice Using Grayscale Analysis
06:41

A New Technique for Quantitative Analysis of Hair Loss in Mice Using Grayscale Analysis

Published on: March 9, 2015

8.7K
Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
11:01

Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

Published on: November 17, 2016

48.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations
07:45

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations

Published on: September 28, 2018

8.7K
A New Technique for Quantitative Analysis of Hair Loss in Mice Using Grayscale Analysis
06:41

A New Technique for Quantitative Analysis of Hair Loss in Mice Using Grayscale Analysis

Published on: March 9, 2015

8.7K
Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
11:01

Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

Published on: November 17, 2016

48.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Quantitative Analysis
  • Software Engineering

Background:

  • Quantitative image analysis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) relies on accurate pixel intensity measurements.
  • MRI manufacturers employ source-specific image scaling, which can introduce variability.
  • Standardization of image analysis is crucial for reliable quantitative MRI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the performance of various software tools in handling MRI manufacturer-specific image scaling.
  • To identify potential biases introduced by uncorrected image scaling in quantitative analysis.
  • To evaluate the impact of image scaling on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Prepared phantoms with varying gadoteridol concentrations to simulate different signal intensities.
  • Acquired pseudodynamic MRI images across multiple scanner series to induce variable image scaling.
  • Analyzed images and ADC maps using 16 software tools across eight research centers.

Main Results:

  • A significant portion of tested software tools failed to correctly account for image scaling from one MRI scanner.
  • Uncorrected image scaling resulted in intensity measurement biases approaching 100% compared to non-scaled images.
  • Inconsistent handling of image scaling across software tools highlights a critical issue in quantitative MRI.

Conclusions:

  • Recommendations are provided for MRI manufacturers to improve image scaling transparency.
  • The quantitative imaging community needs to address software limitations in handling image scaling.
  • Standardized protocols for quantitative image analysis are essential to mitigate scaling-related biases.