Evaluation and comparison of multiple aligners for next-generation sequencing data analysis.
Jing Shang1, Fei Zhu2, Wanwipa Vongsangnak3
1Center for Systems Biology, Soochow University, 1st Shizi Street, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China ; Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China.
Biomed Research International
|April 30, 2014
Summary
Selecting the right next-generation sequencing (NGS) aligner is crucial for accurate data analysis. This study systematically compares NGS aligner performance, offering guidance for biologists to choose optimal tools for their specific research needs.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) generates vast amounts of data.
- Biologists often select NGS aligners without considering performance or accuracy.
- Reference genomes may contain sequence variations and polymorphisms affecting alignment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate and compare the capabilities of multiple NGS data analysis aligners.
- To classify alignment algorithms for better understanding.
- To provide a guiding resource for selecting appropriate aligners.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of multiple NGS aligners.
- Classification of alignment algorithms.
- Evaluation using long-read and short-read datasets (real-life and in silico).
- Assessment based on alignment features, computational performance, and accuracy.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated a comprehensive evaluation and comparison of various NGS aligners.
- Provided insights into the performance differences of aligners.
- Highlighted the importance of aligner selection based on specific criteria.
Conclusions:
- The study offers a valuable resource for biologists needing to select NGS aligners.
- Informed selection of aligners can improve the accuracy and efficiency of NGS data analysis.
- Understanding aligner capabilities is key for diverse genomic applications.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
5.8K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.8K
Next-generation Sequencing
87.9K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
87.9K
Genome Annotation and Assembly
16.7K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
16.7K


