Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

07:13
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
10.6K
A new class of powerful and informative simultaneous confidence intervals
Werner Brannath1, Sylvia Schmidt
1Competence Center for Clinical Trials Bremen, University of Bremen, Linzer Str. 4, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Statistics in Medicine
|May 1, 2014
Summary
New simultaneous confidence intervals (SCIs) improve upon existing methods for clinical trials by ensuring informative rejections. This advancement provides more useful treatment effect estimates in complex study designs.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Methodology
Background:
- Step-down tests enhance hypothesis testing power but can yield non-informative simultaneous confidence intervals (SCIs).
- Non-informative rejections in SCIs limit the utility of treatment effect estimates, especially in multi-treatment clinical trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a new class of SCIs that uniformly improve upon Bonferroni and Holm methods regarding informative rejections.
- To address the deficiency of non-informative rejections in step-down tests when extended to SCIs.
Main Methods:
- Construction of a novel class of SCIs using a dual family of weighted Bonferroni tests.
- Weights in the tests are designed to depend continuously on parameter values.
- Development of a simple algorithm for computation and investigation of shrinkage properties.
Main Results:
- The proposed SCIs uniformly improve upon Bonferroni and Holm SCIs in terms of informative rejections.
- The method demonstrates an attractive shrinkage property for lower confidence bounds.
- The approach is successfully extended to union-intersection tests, including the Dunnett procedure.
Conclusions:
- The new class of SCIs offers a significant improvement for statistical inference in clinical trials, particularly those with multiple treatment arms.
- This method enhances the informativeness of confidence intervals, leading to more reliable treatment effect estimations.
- The findings are validated through simulation studies and illustrated with a real-world clinical trial example.
Related Concept Videos
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
8.8K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
8.8K
Confidence Intervals
9.3K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
A confidence...
9.3K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
9.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.9K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
7.6K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.6K
Confidence Coefficient
9.2K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
9.2K
Prediction Intervals
2.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
2.5K

