Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
A multicenter experience with generic mycophenolate mofetil conversion in stable liver transplant recipients
Jong Man Kim1, Choon Hyuck David Kwon1, Ik Jin Yun2
1Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Generic mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is as effective and safe as the brand-name drug for liver transplant patients. Switching to generic MMF is recommended due to comparable outcomes and potential cost savings.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation Medicine
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Clinical Pharmacy
Background:
- Generic substitution of medications offers significant cost savings and is a recognized medical practice.
- Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a crucial immunosuppressant in liver transplant recipients.
- Evaluating the safety and efficacy of generic formulations is vital for patient care and healthcare economics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical and safety outcomes of liver transplant patients switching from brand-name Cellcept to generic My-rept (MMF).
- To determine if generic MMF maintains comparable efficacy and safety profiles to the originator product in a stable post-transplant population.
Main Methods:
- Prospective data collection from 154 stable adult liver transplant recipients over two years (April 2010 - September 2012).
- Evaluation of complications, safety parameters, quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes post-MMF formulation conversion.
- Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from all participating centers.
Main Results:
- A low incidence of drug-related complications (5.19%) was observed, predominantly mild gastrointestinal issues.
- No significant differences in gastrointestinal symptoms or quality-of-life scores were found pre- and post-conversion.
- Over 90% of patients reported similar experiences with both brand-name and generic MMF formulations.
- Serious adverse events occurred in 5.8% of patients; acute rejection in two patients with no graft loss or mortality.
Conclusions:
- Generic MMF demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to the brand-name formulation in liver transplant recipients.
- The findings support the conversion from brand-name MMF to generic MMF, encouraging its wider adoption.
- This transition is advisable given the comparable clinical outcomes and favorable safety profile observed in this study.
More Related Videos
09:23Author Spotlight: Enhancing Transplantation Research Through MicroCT Angiography in Murine Models
Published on: September 22, 2023
18:48In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of T, B and Myeloid Cells Suppressive Activity and Humoral Responses from Transplant Recipients
Published on: August 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure