Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

2.0K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
2.0K
One-Degree-of-Freedom System01:24

One-Degree-of-Freedom System

1.0K
In mechanical engineering, one-degree-of-freedom systems form the basis of a wide range of electrical and mechanical components. Using these models, engineers can predict the behavior of various parts in a larger system, which gives them insight into how different forces interact with each other.
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
1.0K
Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

800
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
800

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

3D-Printing and Machine Learning Control of Soft Ionic Polymer-Metal Composite Actuators.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

Nanothorn electrodes for ionic polymer-metal composite artificial muscles.

Scientific reports·2014
Same author

Compact ultra-fast vertical nanopositioner for improving scanning probe microscope scan speed.

The Review of scientific instruments·2012
Same author

Cyclic energy harvesting from pyroelectric materials.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2011
Same author

Metabolic adjustments to moderate maternal nutrient restriction.

The British journal of nutrition·2007
Same author

A male baboon (Papio hamadryas) with a mosaic 43,XXY/42,XY karyotype.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2005

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Measurement of Extracellular Ion Fluxes Using the Ion-selective Self-referencing Microelectrode Technique
09:18

Measurement of Extracellular Ion Fluxes Using the Ion-selective Self-referencing Microelectrode Technique

Published on: May 3, 2015

13.6K

Range-based control of dual-stage nanopositioning systems.

Garrett M Clayton1, Christopher J Dudley2, Kam K Leang2

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, USA.

The Review of Scientific Instruments
|May 3, 2014
PubMed
Summary

A new control framework for dual-stage nanopositioners accounts for range constraints, improving precision positioning. This novel approach enhances resolution for applications where speed and range are not inversely correlated.

More Related Videos

Fabricating van der Waals Heterostructures with Precise Rotational Alignment
09:25

Fabricating van der Waals Heterostructures with Precise Rotational Alignment

Published on: July 5, 2019

8.9K
Optimization, Test and Diagnostics of Miniaturized Hall Thrusters
12:22

Optimization, Test and Diagnostics of Miniaturized Hall Thrusters

Published on: February 16, 2019

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Measurement of Extracellular Ion Fluxes Using the Ion-selective Self-referencing Microelectrode Technique
09:18

Measurement of Extracellular Ion Fluxes Using the Ion-selective Self-referencing Microelectrode Technique

Published on: May 3, 2015

13.6K
Fabricating van der Waals Heterostructures with Precise Rotational Alignment
09:25

Fabricating van der Waals Heterostructures with Precise Rotational Alignment

Published on: July 5, 2019

8.9K
Optimization, Test and Diagnostics of Miniaturized Hall Thrusters
12:22

Optimization, Test and Diagnostics of Miniaturized Hall Thrusters

Published on: February 16, 2019

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Engineering
  • Control Systems
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Dual-stage nanopositioners offer long-range and high-speed operation, crucial for applications like scanning probe microscopy.
  • Existing control methods often divert low-speed, short-range movements to lower-resolution actuators, limiting overall precision.
  • This limitation is problematic when the assumption of inverse correlation between range and frequency does not hold.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel dual-stage nanopositioner control framework that incorporates range constraints.
  • To address the limitations of current control schemes in achieving precise positioning trajectories.
  • To overcome the resolution constraints imposed by traditional control methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel control framework for dual-stage nanopositioners.
  • Integration of range constraints into the control strategy.
  • Comparative analysis against existing control schemes.

Main Results:

  • The proposed control framework effectively manages range constraints in dual-stage nanopositioners.
  • Experimental validation demonstrates the superiority of the new approach over existing methods.
  • Improved positioning resolution is achieved, particularly in scenarios where range and frequency are not inversely correlated.

Conclusions:

  • The novel range-based control approach effectively overcomes limitations in existing dual-stage nanopositioner control.
  • This strategy enhances the precision and applicability of nanopositioning systems.
  • The findings are significant for advanced applications requiring high-resolution, flexible positioning.