Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
Comparison of self-report-based and physical performance-based frailty definitions among patients receiving
Kirsten L Johansen1, Lorien S Dalrymple2, Cynthia Delgado3
1United States Renal Data System Nutrition Special Studies Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Nephrology Section, San Francisco VA Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Background:
A well-accepted definition of frailty includes measurements of physical performance, which may limit its clinical utility.
Study Design:
In a cross-sectional study, we compared prevalence and patient characteristics based on a frailty definition that uses self-reported function to the classic performance-based definition and developed a modified self-report-based definition.
Setting & Participants:
Prevalent adult patients receiving hemodialysis in 14 centers around San Francisco and Atlanta in 2009-2011.
Index Tests:
Self-report-based frailty definition in which a score lower than 75 on the Physical Function scale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was substituted for gait speed and grip strength in the classic definition; modified self-report definition with optimized Physical Function score cutoff points derived in a development (one-half) cohort and validated in the other half.
Reference Test:
Performance-based frailty defined as 3 of the following: weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and slow gait speed.
Results:
387 (53%) patients were frail based on self-reported function, of whom 209 (29% of the cohort) met the performance-based definition. Only 23 (3%) met the performance-based definition of frailty only. The self-report definition had 90% sensitivity, 64% specificity, 54% positive predictive value, 93% negative predictive value, and 72.5% overall accuracy. Intracellular water per kilogram of body weight and serum albumin, prealbumin, and creatinine levels were highest among nonfrail individuals, intermediate among those who were frail by self-report, and lowest among those who also were frail by performance. Age, percentage of body fat, and C-reactive protein level followed an opposite pattern. The modified self-report definition had better accuracy (84%; 95% CI, 79%-89%) and superior specificity (88%) and positive predictive value (67%).
Limitations:
Our study did not address prediction of outcomes.
Conclusions:
Patients who meet the self-report-based but not the performance-based definition of frailty may represent an intermediate phenotype. A modified self-report definition can improve the accuracy of a questionnaire-based method of defining frailty.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications

