Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

666
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
666
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Sampling Distribution01:12

Sampling Distribution

17.6K
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
17.6K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

6.2K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
6.2K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

4.5K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
4.5K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

8.3K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robotic-assisted hip and knee replacement in NHS scotland: trends and efficiency implications (2020-2024).

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Machine learning methods for small data and upstream bioprocessing applications: A comprehensive review.

Biotechnology advances·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "Impact of obesity on outcomes after total hip and knee replacement: A study on hospital length of stay and readmission rates in NHS Scotland" [Int. J. Orthopaedic Trauma Nurs. 58 (2025) 101216].

International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing·2025
Same author

Impact of obesity on outcomes after total hip and knee replacement: A study on hospital length of stay and readmission rates in NHS Scotland.

International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing·2025
Same author

Compression ratio: a novel method to quantify compressibility as a diagnostic measurement in giant cell arteritis.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Data-Driven Strategies for Carbimazole Titration: Exploring Machine Learning Solutions in Hyperthyroidism Control.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2024
Same journal

Hidden Data Recovery and Forecasting via Next-Generation Reservoir Computing With Multiscale Delay Selection.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

CAFF-CIL: Causality-Aware Freedom Forgetting Approach for Class-Incremental Learning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Harmonic Autoencoding Framework for Multiple Tasks in Magnetic Particle Imaging Reconstruction.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

A Survey on Human-Centric Voice-Face Multimodal Learning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Vision-Assisted Foundation Model for Solving Multitask Vehicle Routing Problems.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

FP3O: Enabling Proximal Policy Optimization in Multiagent Cooperation With Parameter-Sharing Versatility.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

35.9K

Density-preserving sampling: robust and efficient alternative to cross-validation for error estimation.

Marcin Budka, Bogdan Gabrys

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |May 9, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a novel density-preserving sampling (DPS) method for estimating model generalization error. DPS provides accurate, low-variance estimates efficiently, outperforming traditional cross-validation (CV).

    More Related Videos

    An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
    10:56

    An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

    Published on: April 13, 2019

    9.4K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    14.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

    Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
    07:11

    Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

    Published on: January 7, 2019

    35.9K
    An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
    10:56

    An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

    Published on: April 13, 2019

    9.4K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    14.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Statistical Modeling

    Background:

    • Estimating generalization ability is crucial for model selection and predicting performance on new data.
    • Current methods like cross-validation (CV) are stochastic, requiring multiple runs and significant computation.
    • This computational expense can be prohibitive for complex models or large datasets.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a new, computationally efficient method for generalization error estimation.
    • To eliminate the need for repeated runs in error estimation procedures.
    • To provide reliable and accurate error estimates comparable to repeated CV.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a correntropy-inspired density-preserving sampling (DPS) procedure.
    • DPS divides data into representative subsets, ensuring accuracy without repetition.
    • The method was validated using benchmark datasets and standard classifiers.

    Main Results:

    • DPS produces low-variance generalization error estimates.
    • Accuracy is comparable to 10-fold repeated CV.
    • Achieves these results at a fraction of the computational cost of CV.

    Conclusions:

    • The DPS procedure offers a computationally efficient and accurate alternative for generalization error estimation.
    • DPS is suitable for model ranking and selection.
    • This method addresses the limitations of traditional stochastic estimation techniques.