Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Critical care nurse work environments 2013: a status report
Beth T Ulrich1, Ramón Lavandero2, Dana Woods2
1Beth T. Ulrich is a Senior Partner at Innovative Health Resources, Houston, Texas, and a consultant on Healthy Work Environments for the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses in Aliso Viejo, California, and Editor of the Nephrology Nursing Journal.Ramón Lavandero is a Senior Director of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, and a Clinical Associate Professor at Yale University School of Nursing in New Haven, Connecticut.Dana Woods is the Chief Executive Officer of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.Sean Early is an Adjunct Assistant Professor at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, California. bethulrich@aol.com.
Background:
The health of critical care nurse work environments has been shown to affect patient care outcomes as well as the job satisfaction and retention of registered nurses. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) Critical Care Nurse Work Environment Survey was first conducted in 2006 following the release of the AACN Standards for Establishing and Sustaining a Healthy Work Environment and was conducted again in 2008. This article reports the results of the third AACN Critical Care Nurse Work Environment Survey conducted in 2013.
Objective:
To evaluate the current state of critical care nurse work environments.
Methods:
A total of 8444 AACN members and constituents responded to an online survey.
Results:
The overall health of critical care nurses' work environments has declined since 2008, as have nurses' perceptions of the quality of care. Respondents rated their overall work environment and factors associated with healthy work environments including quality of patient care, staffing, communication and collaboration, respect, physical and mental safety, moral distress, nursing leadership, support for certification and continuing education, meaningful recognition, job satisfaction, and career plans. Although some factors improved, declines in any factors are a concern.
Conclusions:
An increasing body of evidence has shown relationships between healthy nurse work environments and patient outcomes. The results of this 2013 survey identified areas in which the health of critical care nurse work environments needs attention and care, requiring the relentless true collaboration of everyone involved.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Obedience
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
Current Trends in Nursing I
Current Trends in Nursing II

