Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

974
974
Formal Charges02:42

Formal Charges

32.2K
In some cases, there are seemingly more than one valid Lewis structures for molecules and polyatomic ions. The concept of formal charges can be used to help predict the most appropriate Lewis structure when more than one reasonable structure exists.
32.2K
Electrochemical Systems01:24

Electrochemical Systems

179
Electrochemical systems provide a fascinating insight into the dynamic interplay of charged species within various phases. One notable example is the interaction between a membrane permeable to K⁺ ions but not to Cl⁻ ions, separating an aqueous KCl solution from pure water. As K⁺ ions diffuse through the membrane, they generate net charges on each phase, leading to a potential difference between them.Similarly, when a piece of Zn is immersed in an aqueous ZnSO₄ solution,...
179
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mean weighted residuals reveal systematic overestimation of Bragg intensities in single-crystal diffraction.

Journal of applied crystallography·2026
Same author

Two metrics for quantifying systematic errors in diffraction experiments: systematic errors in the variance of the observed intensities and agreement factor gap.

Journal of applied crystallography·2025
Same author

Bias caused by a popular weighting scheme.

Journal of applied crystallography·2025
Same author

Progress in detection of and correction for low-energy contamination.

Journal of applied crystallography·2023
Same author

SEQUENCE SLIDER: expanding polyalanine fragments for phasing with multiple side-chain hypotheses.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2020
Same author

An alternative to the goodness of fit.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2016
Same journal

Case study of using the single-atom R1 method to solve a small protein structure.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2026
Same journal

Beyond complementarity: a reverse-engineering framework for de novo crystal structure determination from EXAFS.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2026
Same journal

Crystallography in Open Science and its open educational resources.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2026
Same journal

From atoms to a data bank: optimizing transferability of electron-density symmetry.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2026
Same journal

Twenty-Sixth General Assembly and International Congress of Crystallography, Melbourne, Australia, 22-29 August 2023.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2026
Same journal

MIDAS: a quantitative framework for high-energy diffraction microscopy. Part II: accuracy, robustness and best practices.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
08:54

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid

Published on: January 25, 2020

5.0K

About systematic errors in charge-density studies.

Julian Henn1, Kathrin Meindl2

  • 1Emil-Warburg-Weg 6, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany.

Acta Crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and Advances
|May 13, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new indicator, R(meta), quantifies systematic errors in crystallographic model refinements. Most published charge-density data show non-Gaussian residuals, often due to data cutoffs, impacting refinement validity.

Keywords:
charge-density studiesleast-squares refinementmeta-residual valuesresidualssystematic errorstheoretical R values

More Related Videos

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

9.2K
Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization
05:37

Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization

Published on: August 22, 2025

779

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
08:54

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid

Published on: January 25, 2020

5.0K
Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

9.2K
Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization
05:37

Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization

Published on: August 22, 2025

779

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography
  • Materials Science
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Theoretical R values provide a basis for assessing systematic errors in crystallographic refinements.
  • Published charge-density data often exhibit residual distributions deviating from Gaussian assumptions.
  • Gaussian distribution is crucial for the validity of least-squares parameter estimates and uncertainties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a relative indicator, R(meta), for systematic errors in crystallographic model refinements.
  • To evaluate the distribution of residuals in published charge-density data.
  • To identify factors influencing residual distributions and their consistency with Gaussian assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized previously established theoretical R values to formulate the R(meta) indicator.
  • Applied R(meta) to analyze residuals from published charge-density refinement datasets.
  • Examined the impact of intensity and significance cutoffs on residual distributions using artificial data.

Main Results:

  • The R(meta) indicator provides an absolute measure of systematic errors in percentage points.
  • Most analyzed published models show residual distributions inconsistent with Gaussian assumptions.
  • Intensity and significance cutoffs were identified as mechanisms hindering Gaussian residual distributions, leading to model bias.

Conclusions:

  • The R(meta) indicator effectively quantifies systematic errors in crystallographic refinements.
  • Deviations from Gaussian residual distributions in published data are common and linked to refinement procedures.
  • Data truncation and cutoffs introduce model bias, compromising the reliability of refinement results.