Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

1.3K
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
1.3K
Forgetting01:21

Forgetting

543
Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...
543
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

609
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
609
Sensory Memory01:14

Sensory Memory

1.0K
Sensory memory captures information from the environment in its original form for a very brief duration, just long enough to be exposed to visual, auditory, and other senses. This type of memory is detailed and rich but quickly lost unless certain strategies are employed to transfer it into short-term or long-term memory. Sensory information is continuously bombarding the human brain, yet only a small fraction is absorbed, as most of it does not significantly impact daily life. For instance,...
1.0K
Long-Term Memory01:18

Long-Term Memory

933
Long-term memory is a relatively permanent type of memory, capable of storing vast amounts of information over extended periods. Its storage capacity is generally considered unlimited.
Long-term memory can be categorized into two primary types: explicit and implicit memory. Explicit memory, also known as declarative memory, involves the conscious recollection of information that we deliberately try to remember, recall, and articulate. This type of memory encompasses specific facts, events, and...
933
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

644
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
644

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliability, bias, and computational cost of estimating the Bayes factor using bridge sampling and the Savage-Dickey density ratio.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The role of eye movements and covert shifts of attention in working and long-term memory retrieval.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

How is free time used in complex span tasks?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Does the benefit of time for working memory arise at encoding or retrieval?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Revisiting the retro-cue benefit: Why does focusing attention result in improved memory performance?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Forget For Now, but Remember Later: Can People Selectively Remove Information From Working Memory While Keeping it in Long-Term Memory?

Journal of cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.9K

Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay.

Alessandra S Souza1, Klaus Oberauer

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, a.souza@psychologie.uzh.ch.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|May 15, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Forgetting in visual working memory (WM) is better explained by how distinct events are in time, not just how much time has passed. Relative timing of events, not absolute duration, drives memory interference.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Forgetting from working memory (WM) is debated between decay and interference theories.
  • Decay theories posit forgetting depends on absolute time, while interference theories emphasize relative timing (temporal distinctiveness).
  • Recent studies showing performance decline with longer retention intervals are interpreted differently by these theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To contrast the effects of absolute time versus relative time on forgetting in visual working memory.
  • To investigate whether decay or temporal distinctiveness better explains forgetting in visual WM.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a continuous color recall task to assess visual working memory.
  • Manipulated the retention interval (absolute time) and inter-trial interval (relative timing).
  • Employed mixture modeling to analyze recall errors and memory precision.

Main Results:

  • Memory errors were significantly influenced by the ratio of retention interval to inter-trial interval, supporting temporal distinctiveness.
  • Lower temporal distinctiveness led to a reduced probability of recalling the target color.
  • No significant changes in the precision of memory recall were observed based on temporal distinctiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Findings challenge the role of decay in explaining visual working memory forgetting.
  • Relative spacing of events in time is a critical determinant of interference in working memory.
  • Temporal distinctiveness provides a more robust explanation for forgetting in visual working memory tasks.