Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
Published on: February 20, 2019
Dorsomedial striatum involvement in regulating conflict between current and presumed outcomes
Anna Mestres-Missé1, Pierre-Louis Bazin2, Robert Trampel2
1School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract:
The balance between automatic and controlled processing is essential to human flexible but optimal behavior. On the one hand, the automation of habitual behavior and processing is indispensable, and, on the other hand, strategic processing is needed in light of unexpected, conflicting, or new situations. Using ultra-high-field high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (7T-fMRI), the present study examined the role of subcortical structures in mediating this balance. Participants were asked to judge the congruency of sentences containing a semantically ambiguous or unambiguous word. Ambiguous sentences had three possible resolutions: dominant meaning, subordinate meaning, and incongruent. The dominant interpretation represents the most habitual response, whereas both the subordinate and incongruent options clash with this automatic response, and, hence, require cognitive control. Moreover, the subordinate resolution entails a less expected but correct outcome, while the incongruent condition is simply wrong. The current results reveal the involvement of the anterior dorsomedial striatum in modulating and resolving conflict between actual and expected outcomes, and highlight the importance of cortical and subcortical cooperation in this process.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Self-Regulation
Diencephalon: Thalamus and Information Relay
Cognitive Dissonance