Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

1.3K
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
1.3K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

514
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
514
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

925
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
925
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

11.8K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
11.8K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

855
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
855
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

30.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
30.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Age-Related Differences in the Appetite-Regulating Hormone Response to Exercise.

Current developments in nutrition·2025
Same author

Data from ManyDogs 1.

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same author

Less activity means improved welfare? How pair housing influences pinyon jay (<i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>) behaviour.

Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)·2024
Same author

Social Influences on Similarity Judgments and Intertemporal Choice.

Psychological reports·2023
Same author

Impulsivity as a trait in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2023
Same author

Biological and behavioral predictors of relative energy intake after acute exercise.

Appetite·2023
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K

Evolutionary pressures on primate intertemporal choice.

Jeffrey R Stevens1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Center for Brain, Biology, and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0156, USA jeffrey.r.stevens@gmail.com.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|May 16, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Animal species show varied willingness to wait for rewards. A study found that factors like body mass and lifespan, not brain size, predict how long primates wait, supporting adaptive evolution of decision-making.

Keywords:
allometrybrain sizedecision makingintertemporal choiceprimatessocial group size

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.1K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Comparative Cognition

Background:

  • Animals make intertemporal choices, balancing immediate versus delayed fitness benefits.
  • Species exhibit significant variation in their patience for delayed rewards, prompting evolutionary inquiry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the adaptive basis of interspecies variation in intertemporal choice behavior.
  • To determine if allometric factors predict waiting times in primate species.

Main Methods:

  • Phylogenetic regression analysis was employed.
  • Thirteen primate species were tested in laboratory intertemporal choice tasks.
  • Allometric factors including body mass, absolute and relative brain size, lifespan, and home range size were assessed.

Main Results:

  • A composite allometric factor (body mass, absolute brain size, lifespan, home range size) significantly predicted waiting times.
  • Relative brain size and social group size did not predict waiting times.
  • Phylogenetic controls were applied to the analyses.

Conclusions:

  • Interspecies differences in time preferences are shaped by selective pressures related to environmental challenges.
  • Intertemporal choice behavior in animals is influenced by adaptive evolutionary processes.
  • Further cross-species data collection is crucial for understanding the evolution of decision-making and cognition.