Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Aberrant recruitment of the striatum and insula is associated with recalling and suppressing fatigue- and anger-related memories in people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis.

Brain communications·2026

Same author

Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer after prior vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy (COSMIC-311): outcomes by BRAF status.

Frontiers in oncology·2026

Same author

The network approach to psychopathology: investigating inter-individual variability and the association with clinical relapse in psychosis.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025

Same author

Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in metastatic prostate cancer (CONTACT-02): final analyses from a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2025

Same author

Synthetic Lethal Targeting of CDK12-Deficient Prostate Cancer with PARP Inhibitors.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2024

Same author

Variability and magnitude of brain glutamate levels in schizophrenia: a meta and mega-analysis.

Molecular psychiatry·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Statistical network analysis for functional MRI: summary networks and group comparisons.

Cedric E Ginestet¹, Arnaud P Fournel², Andrew Simmons³

¹Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University Boston, MA, USA ; Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London London, UK ; National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health and Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia London, UK.

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

|May 17, 2014

Summary

Comparing neuroscience networks is challenging due to density-dependent topology. This review explores creating summary networks and testing topological differences, highlighting sensitivity to density variations in network metrics.

Keywords:

N-back density-integrated metrics networks small-world topology statistical parametric network (SPN)weighted density working memory

More Related Videos

Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Published on: August 5, 2014

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Published on: August 5, 2014

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Network Science
Computational Biology

Background:

Network topology analysis is crucial in neuroscience.
Comparing networks is complicated by density (edge number/weight) variations.
Topological differences are often confounded by density differences.

Purpose of the Study:

To address challenges in comparing neuroscience networks with varying densities.
To review methods for constructing summary networks from network data.
To examine statistical approaches for testing topological differences between network families.

Main Methods:

Discusses constructing summary networks using a mass-univariate approach yielding statistical parametric networks (SPNs).
Reviews methods for comparing topological functions across network families with differing densities.
Highlights the sensitivity of topological metrics (e.g., global efficiency, modularity) to density.

Main Results:

Statistical parametric networks (SPNs) offer a method for summarizing network families.
Key topological metrics are highly sensitive to density variations in both weighted and unweighted networks.
Differences in density significantly impact the interpretation of topological comparisons.

Conclusions:

Caution is advised when statistically comparing network families with differing densities.
Constructing appropriate summary networks is essential for reliable network comparisons.
Standard topological metrics may yield misleading results if density differences are not accounted for.