Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

A Protocol for Analyzing Hepatitis C Virus Replication
Published on: June 26, 2014
Using statistical models to assess medical cost of hepatitis C virus
Mohsen Vahedi1, Asma Pourhoseingholi2, Sara Ashtari3
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Insights
Negative binomial regression (NB) is more effective than Poisson regression (PR) for predicting Hepatitis C virus (HCV) patient costs in Iran. This finding aids in better financial planning for HCV treatment and management.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Biostatistics
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Hepatitis C virus (HCV) poses a significant economic burden in Iran, with associated costs often poorly characterized.
- Accurate cost data is crucial for effective budgeting and informed decision-making in healthcare.
- Statistical regression models, specifically Poisson regression (PR) and negative binomial regression (NB), are commonly employed for predicting healthcare costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive accuracy of Poisson regression (PR) and negative binomial regression (NB) for estimating direct medical costs in Hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients in Iran.
- To identify key factors influencing the direct costs associated with HCV patient treatment.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2001 to 2010, analyzing data from the first treatment period of each patient.
- Direct medical costs, including doctor visits, medications, hospitalization, and laboratory tests, were estimated in Purchasing Power Parity dollars (PPP$).
- Both Poisson regression (PR) and negative binomial regression (NB) models, derived from generalized linear models (GLM), were utilized for cost prediction.
Main Results:
- The Likelihood ratio test indicated that the negative binomial regression (NB) model was significantly more appropriate than the Poisson regression (PR) model for predicting HCV patient costs (P < 0.001).
- Factors such as HCV genotype, marital status, specific medications (Pegasys), and sustained virologic response (SVR) were identified as significant predictors of cost.
- Specifically, Genotype 3 was associated with lower costs compared to Genotype 1, while marriage, Pegasys medication, and achieving SVR were linked to increased costs.
Conclusions:
- Selecting the appropriate statistical model is critical for accurately analyzing and predicting healthcare costs, especially given the unique characteristics of cost data.
- The superior performance of the negative binomial regression (NB) model allows for more reliable prediction of future patient costs under various circumstances.
- This study provides valuable insights for healthcare resource allocation and financial planning related to Hepatitis C virus management in Iran.
Aim:
This study compared PR and NB in predicting HCV patient costs. The objective of this study was to predict the direct cost of the HCV patient in Iran.
Background:
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a common and expensive infectious disease in Iran. Cost associated with HCV and its complications has not been well characterized. Analysis of cost data is important in providing consistent information to aid budgeting decisions and certain statistical regression models need for prediction mean costs. Poisson regression (PR) and negative binomial regression (NB) are more common in cost prediction study.
Patients And Methods:
This study designed as a cross-sectional clinic base from 2001 to 2010. First treatment period of each patient bring in study. We evaluated the doctor visiting, drugs, and hospitalization and laboratory tests of patients. Cost per person per one treatment period estimated in purchasing power parity dollars (PPP$). The PR is one of the models from general linear models (GLM) for describing count outcomes. The NB is another model from (GLM) as an alternative to the PR model.
Results:
According to Likelihood ratio test NB was found to be more appropriate than PR (P < 0.001). Genotype, marriage, medication, and SVR were being significant. Genotype 3 versus 1 decreasing cost while marriage, consuming pegasys and SVR increasing.
Conclusion:
Choosing best model in cost data is important because of specific feature of this data. After fitting the best model, analyzing and predicting future cost for patient in different situation is possible.
Related Concept Videos
Hepatitis
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Viral Hepatitis I: Introduction
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion,...
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow

