Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Capillary Index Score in the Interventional Management of Stroke trials I and II
Firas Al-Ali1, Thomas A Tomsick2, John J Connors2
1From the Division of Neurointerventional Surgery, CNS Healthcare Foundation, Akron, OH (F.A.-A., G.Z.M., Z.A.-A.); Department of Radiology (T.A.T.) and Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine (J.P.B.), University of Cincinnati Neuroscience Institute, OH; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (J.J.C.); and Department of Neurology (J.M.G.) and Department of Research (J.J.E.), Akron General Medical Center, OH. firasalali@aol.com.
Background And Purpose:
The Capillary Index Score (CIS) is a simple angiography-based scale for assessing viable tissue in the ischemic territory. We retrospectively applied it to Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) trials I and II to evaluate the predictive value for good outcomes.
Methods:
CIS was calculated from pretreatment diagnostic cerebral angiograms blinded to outcome. IMS I and II diagnostic cerebral angiogram images of sufficient quality were reviewed and CIS calculated for treated subjects with internal carotid artery or M1 occlusion. CIS scoring (0-3) was dichotomized into favorable (f CIS; 2 or 3) and poor (p CIS; 0 or 1). Modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2b or 3 was considered good revascularization. CIS and modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scores were compared with good outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale score≤2 at 90 days.
Results:
Twenty-eight of 161 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen (46%) had f CIS. Good clinical outcome was significantly different between the 2 CIS groups (62% for f CIS versus 7% for p CIS; P=0.004). Good reperfusion correlated to good outcome (P=0.04). No significant differences in time to intravenous or intra-arterial treatment were identified between f CIS and p CIS groups (P>0.25).
Conclusions:
A f CIS was found in ≈50% of subjects and was a virtual prerequisite for good outcome in this study subgroup of IMS I and II. We call this the 50% barrier.
More Related Videos
12:15Optimized System for Cerebral Perfusion Monitoring in the Rat Stroke Model of Intraluminal Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion
Published on: February 17, 2013
06:58Microvascular Perfusion Monitored by Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging during Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice
Published on: February 27, 2026