Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

1.5K
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
1.5K
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

3.3K
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Verbal and Visuospatial Working Memory Performance During the CO<sub>2</sub> Challenge Model of Anxiety.

Human psychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Atypical PI3Ks coordinate chemotaxis, signaling dynamics, and multicellular development in <i>Dictyostelium</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Ten questions concerning water quality in building hot water systems.

Building and environment·2026
Same author

<i>Naegleria</i> amoebae seek confinement and crawl persistently through narrow spaces.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Integrated longitudinal transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of the murine lung response to influenza a virus.

American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology·2025
Same author

Testing for heavy metals in drinking water collected from Dog Aging Project participants.

PLOS water·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater
08:27

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater

Published on: November 7, 2025

1.8K

Profile sampling to characterize particulate lead risks in potable water.

Brandi Clark1, Sheldon Masters, Marc Edwards

  • 1Virginia Tech , Civil and Environmental Engineering, 418 Durham Hall, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.

Environmental Science & Technology
|May 29, 2014
PubMed
Summary

New lead (Pb) profiling reveals high-flow water samples show higher Pb concentrations than stagnant samples. This challenges previous assumptions and highlights risks from particulate lead, necessitating updated public health guidance.

More Related Videos

Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water
10:34

Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water

Published on: August 3, 2016

9.2K
Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater
08:27

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater

Published on: November 7, 2025

1.8K
Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water
10:34

Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water

Published on: August 3, 2016

9.2K
Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Public Health
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Traditional lead (Pb) profiling assesses drinking water contamination after stagnation.
  • Existing methods have limitations in quantifying risks associated with particulate Pb.
  • Understanding lead exposure sources is crucial for consumer health protection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a new lead profiling protocol to better quantify particulate lead risks.
  • To investigate the relationship between water flow rate and lead (Pb) concentrations.
  • To identify different risk categories for lead exposure in homes.

Main Methods:

  • A novel profiling protocol collecting sequential samples at escalating flow rates from the same tap.
  • Comparison of lead concentrations in samples collected at low (stagnant) vs. high flow rates.
  • Analysis of lead in samples with and without visible particulates and assessment of sample handling protocols.

Main Results:

  • Lead (Pb) exposure risks varied significantly between homes based on flow rate.
  • High-flow, non-stagnant samples showed 3-4 times higher Pb concentrations than stagnant, first-draw samples.
  • Some EPA-allowed methods significantly underestimated total lead (Pb) present, missing up to 99.9% in certain cases.

Conclusions:

  • The new profiling method reveals a "worst-case" lead release scenario at high flow rates, contradicting prior regulatory assumptions.
  • Homes can be categorized into risk groups requiring tailored flushing advice and public education.
  • Current sampling and handling methods may severely underestimate lead (Pb) exposure, particularly from particulate lead.