Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

10.2K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
10.2K
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

2.0K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
2.0K
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

949
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
949
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K
Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

2.0K
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
2.0K
Vision01:24

Vision

48.5K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
48.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Representation-specific recruitment: Bidirectional interactions between working memory and perception for motion direction and face identity.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Individual gaze preferences and attentional cues interact in masked and unmasked face recognition.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Task irrelevant sounds influence visual attention through graded crossmodal semantic modulation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Feature identification learning both shapes and is shaped by spatial object-similarity representations.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Task-irrelevant semantic relationship between objects and scene influence attentional allocation.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Predicting attentional allocation in real-world environments: The need to investigate crossmodal semantic guidance.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2024
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Listeners near-optimally integrate acoustic and semantic cues in spoken word recognition: Evidence from experiments manipulating cue order and reliability.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.0K

Hemifield asymmetries differentiate VSTM for single- and multiple-feature objects.

Summer Sheremata1, Sarah Shomstein

  • 1Department of Psychology, George Washington University, 2125 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA, ssheremata@gwu.edu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|May 31, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) capacity is constrained by the intraparietal sulcus. Hemispheric asymmetries in VSTM shift, benefiting left visual fields for single items but right visual fields for complex items.

More Related Videos

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

4.7K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.0K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

4.7K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Visual System

Background:

  • Visual short-term memory (VSTM) is crucial for temporary information storage.
  • The intraparietal sulcus (IPS), part of the frontoparietal network, plays a key role in VSTM and visual attention.
  • IPS exhibits hemispheric asymmetries, with the left hemisphere processing the right visual field and the right hemisphere processing both visual fields.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate hemifield asymmetries in VSTM performance for objects with varying feature complexity.
  • To determine if VSTM resource allocation differs across visual hemifields based on item complexity.
  • To test the flexible resource model of VSTM.

Main Methods:

  • Participants' memory performance was assessed across the visual field for single- and two-feature objects.
  • Behavioral biases in memory recall were analyzed in relation to object complexity and visual hemifield.
  • Individual differences in memory costs were correlated with observed biases.

Main Results:

  • A memory benefit for single-feature items was observed in the left visual hemifield, consistent with right-hemisphere dominance.
  • A reversed bias emerged for two-feature objects, showing a benefit in the right visual hemifield.
  • The shift in hemifield biases correlated with individual differences, suggesting resource redistribution.

Conclusions:

  • VSTM exhibits flexible hemifield biases that depend on the number of features to be remembered.
  • These findings support a model where VSTM resources are dynamically reallocated across the visual field.
  • Hemispheric asymmetries in VSTM are adaptable, with both hemispheres potentially representing information in the right hemifield under high cognitive load.