Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Risk Gambling and Personality: Results from a Representative Swedish Sample
Kristina Sundqvist1, Peter Wennberg2
1Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD), Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden. kristina.sundqvist@sorad.su.se.
This study found weak links between risk gambling and personality traits like Negative Affectivity and Impulsivity in a representative Swedish population. Interventions should consider individual personality differences for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavioral Science
- Public Health
Background:
- Previous research explored personality and gambling, but lacked representative population data.
- Understanding personality's role in gambling is crucial for effective interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the association between risk gambling and personality traits in a representative Swedish population.
- To investigate differences in personality across gambling preferences and risk levels.
Main Methods:
- A representative Swedish sample (N=19,530) was screened for risk gambling using the Lie/Bet questionnaire.
- A subsample (N=257) completed postal questionnaires on gambling and personality (NODS-PERC, HP5i).
- Statistical analyses examined correlations between risk gambling, personality facets, age, and gender.
Main Results:
- Weak positive correlations were found between risk gambling and Negative Affectivity (Neuroticism facet) and Impulsivity (Conscientiousness facet).
- No personality differences were observed across game preferences when controlling for age and gender.
- Preferred game type correlated with the level of risk gambling.
- Risk gamblers scored lower on Negative Affectivity than population norms; risk gambling men scored higher on Impulsivity.
Conclusions:
- The association between risk gambling and personality is corroborated in a representative population.
- Risk and problem gamblers are not a homogeneous group; interventions need personalization.
- Prevention and treatment should be tailored based on personality, game preference, and game risk potential.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Personality Theory by Eysenck and Eysenck
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Borderline Personality Disorder
Genetic and Environmental Contributions
Borderline Personality...
Dark Triad and Person Perception

