Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

1.0K
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Violating statistical structure impairs detection of deviant and incidental events.

iScience·2026
Same author

Evidence for Cardiac Phase-Linked Perception of Heartbeats.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Individuals with aphantasia show independent impairments in face perception and face memory, but not face matching.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Refinements of the phase adjustment task (PAT 2.0).

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Individual Differences in Heartbeat-Tone Synchronicity Judgments Suggest the Two-Alternative Heartbeat Detection Task Is a Poor Test of Cardiac Interoceptive Accuracy and Insight.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Mentalising impairments in somatic symptom and functional neurological disorders: A systematic review.

Journal of psychosomatic research·2026
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
10:02

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy

Published on: November 3, 2016

26.2K

Authors’ response: mirror neurons: tests and testability.

Caroline Catmur, Clare Press, Richard Cook

    The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
    |June 5, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Commentators often debate conceptual frameworks of mirror neurons, but empirical data is crucial. Future research should prioritize system-level theories and rigorous experimental testing for advancements in mirror neuron research.

    More Related Videos

    Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    10:10

    Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Published on: January 30, 2026

    657
    Author Spotlight: A Battery of Highly Reproducible Behavioral Tests to Validate an Angelman Syndrome Murine Model
    11:05

    Author Spotlight: A Battery of Highly Reproducible Behavioral Tests to Validate an Angelman Syndrome Murine Model

    Published on: October 20, 2023

    4.4K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

    A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
    10:02

    A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy

    Published on: November 3, 2016

    26.2K
    Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    10:10

    Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Published on: January 30, 2026

    657
    Author Spotlight: A Battery of Highly Reproducible Behavioral Tests to Validate an Angelman Syndrome Murine Model
    11:05

    Author Spotlight: A Battery of Highly Reproducible Behavioral Tests to Validate an Angelman Syndrome Murine Model

    Published on: October 20, 2023

    4.4K

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Cognitive Science

    Background:

    • The mirror neuron system is a key area of research in neuroscience.
    • Current debates often center on conceptual frameworks rather than empirical evidence.
    • Distinguishing between genetic and associative accounts of mirror neurons remains a challenge.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address the conceptual focus in mirror neuron research.
    • To highlight the need for empirical data over theoretical challenges.
    • To emphasize the importance of system-level theories and experimental validation.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of commentary on conceptual frameworks.
    • Evaluation of the role of empirical data in the mirror neuron debate.
    • Identification of needs for future research directions.

    Main Results:

    • Commentators have predominantly focused on conceptual aspects.
    • There is a lack of empirical data to support or refute existing theories.
    • The debate requires more system-level theories and carefully designed experiments.

    Conclusions:

    • Empirically focused comments are particularly valuable for advancing the field.
    • The mirror neuron debate needs a shift towards testable hypotheses and empirical validation.
    • Future research should prioritize rigorous experimentation to resolve theoretical discrepancies.