Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

06:40
Simple and Computer-assisted Olfactory Testing for Mice
Published on: June 15, 2015
9.7K
Strain differences in mouse response to odours of predators.
G Dell'Omo1, M Fiore, E Alleva
1Section of Behavioural Pathophysiology, Laboratorio di Fisiopatologia di Organo e di Sistema, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, I-00161 Rome, Italy.
Behavioural Processes
|June 5, 2014
Summary
Mouse strain differences influence defensive behaviors when exposed to predator odors. Fox scent triggers varied anti-predatory strategies, highlighting adaptive evolutionary responses in mice.
Area of Science:
- Ethology
- Animal Behavior
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Predator-prey interactions are crucial for understanding animal behavior and evolution.
- Rodent defensive behaviors are often triggered by olfactory cues from predators.
- Inbred mouse strains exhibit genetic variations that can influence behavioral responses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate strain-specific behavioral responses of mice to predator and non-predator olfactory cues.
- To determine if exposure to predator scent affects locomotor activity and defensive behaviors.
- To assess the impact of predator odor exposure on pain perception (analgesia).
Main Methods:
- Male mice of three strains (CD-1, CBA, C57BI/6J) were exposed to fox (predator) or rabbit (non-predator) feces in a controlled arena.
- Behavioral responses including locomotor activity, latency to approach, and specific actions (burying, sniffing, rearing) were recorded.
- Hot-plate test was used to measure analgesia before and after odor exposure.
Main Results:
- Predator (fox) odor elicited strain-specific defensive behaviors.
- CD-1 and C57BI/6J mice showed increased latency to approach and decreased contact with the scent source.
- CBA mice exhibited increased defensive burying and sniffing, with decreased rearing in response to fox odor.
- No significant effects on grooming, digging, wall rearing, or hot-plate analgesia were observed across strains.
Conclusions:
- Mouse strain significantly impacts defensive strategies against predator olfactory cues.
- Observed strain differences in anti-predatory responses support evolutionary adaptive hypotheses.
- Inbred mouse strain genetics likely play a role in shaping specific defensive behaviors.

