Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining non-reinforced lever pressing as intrinsically-motivated behavior.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

The effects of temporal arrangement and landmark stability in a spatial occasion setting task with pigeons.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same author

A New Procedure and Stimulus Set for Examining Cross-Modality Mental Rotation.

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same author

Emotion Labeling in Pigeons.

Affective science·2025
Same author

The role of associative learning in sensitization.

Learning & behavior·2025
Same author

Amphipods (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus) do not demonstrate a left-right preference in a 3-D printed aquatic T-maze.

Behavioural processes·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K

Feature-positive discriminations during a spatial-search task with humans.

Chad M Ruprecht1, Joshua E Wolf, Nina I Quintana

  • 1Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, 2800 S. University Dr., Box 298920, Fort Worth, TX, 76129, USA.

Learning & Behavior
|June 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study shows how conditional cues influence spatial search behavior. Landmarks provide more reliable spatial information than conditional cues in operant discriminations.

More Related Videos

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

13.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K
An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

13.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Operant discriminations involve conditional cues that signal reinforcement. Landmarks guide spatial search but their conditional control is understudied.
  • Understanding how conditional cues and spatial landmarks interact is crucial for explaining complex search behaviors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how conditional cues influence spatial search behavior guided by landmarks.
  • To determine whether spatial information from landmarks or conditional cues is weighted more heavily.

Main Methods:

  • College students performed a search task where target location was signaled by a landmark, contingent on a preceding conditional cue.
  • Experiments involved feature-positive training and transfer tests to assess conditional control and spatial accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Participants demonstrated conditional control, with response magnitude explained by hierarchical models.
  • Spatial accuracy indicated a stronger weighting of landmark information over conditional cues, though some spatial interference was observed.
  • Reliability, stability, and proximity of landmarks were key factors in spatial learning.

Conclusions:

  • Hierarchical accounts effectively explain response magnitude in conditional discrimination tasks.
  • Spatial learning models emphasizing landmark salience are better predictors of spatial accuracy in these tasks.
  • Conditional cues can modulate spatial search, but landmarks often provide more robust spatial guidance.