Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

12.5K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
12.5K
Protein-Protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-Protein Interfaces

3.4K
3.4K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.1K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.1K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

1.1K
1.1K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

11.8K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
11.8K
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

7.2K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying domain-specific relevance of computational biology Wikipedia articles using TF-IDF and cosine similarity.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Reaping the Fruits of LLM Pruning: Towards Small Language Models for Efficient Non-Coding Variant Effect Prediction.

Genes·2025
Same author

Language Modelling Techniques for Analysing the Impact of Human Genetic Variation.

Bioinformatics and biology insights·2025
Same author

Air Pollution Monitoring Using Cost-Effective Devices Enhanced by Machine Learning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Cloud based evaluation of databases for stock market data.

Journal of cloud computing (Heidelberg, Germany)·2022
Same author

<i>In silico</i> design of bioisosteric modifications of drugs for the treatment of diabetes.

Future medicinal chemistry·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K

Scoring docking conformations using predicted protein interfaces.

Reyhaneh Esmaielbeiki1, Jean-Christophe Nebel

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, 1 South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, UK. Reyhaneh.Esmaielbeiki@dtc.ox.ac.uk.

BMC Bioinformatics
|June 8, 2014
PubMed
Summary

T-PioDock improves protein-protein interaction modeling by accurately identifying near-native complex structures. This framework enhances docking predictions, aiding in understanding biological processes and drug design.

More Related Videos

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

295
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K
A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

295
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Protein-protein interactions are crucial for biological processes and drug design.
  • Experimental methods for analyzing protein complexes have limitations.
  • Accurate prediction of protein complex structures is an ongoing challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop T-PioDock, a framework for identifying native-like 3D structures of protein-protein complexes.
  • To improve the scoring of protein complex models generated by docking software.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Template based Protein Interface Prediction (T-PIP) to score binding interfaces.
  • Developed the T-PioDock framework to identify near-native conformations from docking-generated 3D models.

Main Results:

  • T-PIP demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in predicting protein binding interfaces.
  • T-PioDock outperformed existing scoring methods in identifying near-native protein complex structures.
  • A strong correlation was observed between T-PioDock performance and the quality of docking models.

Conclusions:

  • T-PioDock represents a significant advancement in identifying near-native protein complex conformations.
  • Limitations remain in current docking software's ability to generate all native-like models.
  • Future improvements in interface predictors are needed to address ambiguities in assessing complex quality.