Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

267
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
267
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.0K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.5K
3.5K
lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs02:39

lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs

9.7K
In humans, more than 80% of the genome gets transcribed. However, only around 2% of the genome codes for proteins. The remaining part produces non-coding RNAs which includes ribosomal RNAs, transfer RNAs, telomerase RNAs, and regulatory RNAs, among other types. A large number of regulatory non-coding RNAs have been classified into two groups depending upon their length – small non-coding RNAs, such as microRNA, which are less than 200 nucleotides in length, and long non-coding RNA...
9.7K
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

558
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
558
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination02:52

Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination

13.7K
When a nucleophile and an alkyl halide react, nucleophilic substitution and β-elimination reactions compete to generate products.
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
13.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying domain-specific relevance of computational biology Wikipedia articles using TF-IDF and cosine similarity.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on computational biology early career researchers: A global retrospective study.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Language Modelling Techniques for Analysing the Impact of Human Genetic Variation.

Bioinformatics and biology insights·2025
Same author

An educator framework for organizing Wikipedia editathons for computational biology.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Air Pollution Monitoring Using Cost-Effective Devices Enhanced by Machine Learning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Closing the computational biology 'knowledge gap': Spanish Wikipedia as a case study.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2024
Same journal

Tissue MicroRNAs in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review of Studies in Human Myocardium and Animal Models with Implications for Post-Mortem Molecular Diagnostics.

Genes·2026
Same journal

Genetic Variants and Dental Caries Susceptibility: An Umbrella Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.

Genes·2026
Same journal

Generative AI and Language Models in Human Genetics and Health: From Variant Interpretation to Clinical Decision Support.

Genes·2026
Same journal

Familial White-Sutton Syndrome Caused by a Pathogenic POGZ p.Arg508* Variant: Intrafamilial Variability from Childhood to Adulthood.

Genes·2026
Same journal

Genetic Influence on LDL-Cholesterol Levels: Role of Polygenic Risk Scores and Lp(a) Beyond Monogenic Hypercholesterolemia.

Genes·2026
Same journal

THBS1 as a Key Regulator of Myoblasts: Validation of Its Inhibitory Roles in Skeletal Muscle Development.

Genes·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1000

Reaping the Fruits of LLM Pruning: Towards Small Language Models for Efficient Non-Coding Variant Effect Prediction.

Megha Hegde1, Jean-Christophe Nebel2, Farzana Rahman1

  • 1School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Kingston University, London KT1 2EE, UK.

Genes
|November 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Layer pruning makes large genomic language models more efficient for variant prediction. Removing redundant layers reduces computational demands without sacrificing accuracy, improving non-coding variant interpretation.

Keywords:
deep learninglarge language modelnon-coding DNAsmall language modelvariant effect prediction

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

785
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1000
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

785
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Interpreting genetic variants is crucial for precision medicine.
  • Large genomic language models (LLMs) struggle with non-coding variant prediction due to computational scaling.
  • Layer pruning, successful in natural language processing, can optimize LLMs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the contribution of each Transformer layer in genomic LLMs (DNABERT 2, Nucleotide Transformer) for variant prediction.
  • To develop pruned, more computationally efficient LLMs by removing non-critical layers.
  • To assess the performance of pruned LLMs on a non-coding variant effect prediction benchmark.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic layer ablation of DNABERT 2 and Nucleotide Transformer models.
  • Building layer importance profiles based on performance changes.
  • Fine-tuning pruned and full models on the Enformer eQTL causal variant dataset.
  • Comparing performance metrics (accuracy, AUC) and resource usage (training time, memory).

Main Results:

  • Layer importance varied significantly across models, with some layers being removable with minimal performance loss.
  • Pruned models achieved accuracy and AUC comparable to full models after fine-tuning.
  • Pruned models demonstrated substantial reductions in training time and memory requirements.

Conclusions:

  • Layer-wise pruning is an effective strategy for creating compact and efficient genomic LLMs.
  • Pruned LLMs maintain predictive power while significantly lowering computational demands.
  • This approach enhances the accessibility of large-scale non-coding variant analysis for research and clinical applications.