Related Experiment Videos
[Centric registration relation in dentate patients using bilateral manipulation--comparative analysis of three
H J De Paiva1, G Bonfante, A Lins do Valle
1Universidade de São Paulo.
Revista De Odontologia Da Universidade De Sao Paulo
|October 1, 1989
Summary
Three centric relation registration techniques were compared. No significant statistical differences were found, indicating centric relation occurs in an area, not a point. The Leaf-Gauge (LONG JUNIOR) technique is recommended for its ease and speed.
Area of Science:
- Dental Occlusion
- Prosthodontics
Background:
- Accurate centric relation registration is crucial for successful dental restorations.
- Various techniques exist, but their comparative efficacy requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the statistical significance of three distinct centric relation registration techniques.
- To determine if centric relation is best defined as an area or a point.
Main Methods:
- Utilized three registration methods: Jig (LUCIA), Leaf-Gauge (LONG JUNIOR), and an anterior wax guide.
- Mounted dental casts on a Whip-Mix articulator for analysis.
- Performed statistical analysis to compare the outcomes of each technique.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were observed among the three tested techniques.
- Findings suggest that centric relation is best understood as an area rather than a precise point.
- The Leaf-Gauge (LONG JUNIOR) technique demonstrated superior facility and quickness in registration.
Conclusions:
- All evaluated centric relation registration techniques yielded comparable statistical results.
- The Leaf-Gauge (LONG JUNIOR) technique is recommended for clinical practice due to its efficiency and simplicity.