Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

06:58
Microvascular Perfusion Monitored by Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging during Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice
Published on: February 27, 2026
177
Can selective arterial clamping with fluorescence imaging preserve kidney function during robotic partial
Tyler R McClintock1, Marc A Bjurlin1, James S Wysock1
1Department of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.
Urology
|June 10, 2014
Summary
Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging during robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) with selective clamping improved short-term kidney function. Long-term benefits require further investigation in prospective studies.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Innovation
- Renal Function Preservation
Background:
- Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a standard treatment for kidney tumors.
- Preserving renal function is a key goal during partial nephrectomy.
- Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging offers potential for enhanced surgical precision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare renal functional outcomes between RPN with selective arterial clamping guided by NIRF imaging and RPN without these techniques.
- To evaluate the impact of NIRF-guided selective clamping on postoperative kidney function.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 42 patients underwent NIRF-enhanced RPN with selective clamping.
- Outcomes were compared to a matched cohort undergoing RPN without selective clamping and NIRF imaging.
- Matching criteria included tumor size, preoperative eGFR, and patient demographics.
Main Results:
- Selective clamping with NIRF demonstrated superior short-term renal function post-discharge (e.g., higher postoperative eGFR, smaller eGFR reduction).
- These functional benefits showed a trend towards attenuation at 3-month follow-up.
- The selective clamping group experienced a low rate of perioperative complications (Clavien grade I-III).
Conclusions:
- NIRF imaging-guided selective clamping in RPN is associated with improved short-term renal functional outcomes.
- The observed benefits diminished at later follow-up.
- Further randomized prospective studies are necessary to confirm long-term efficacy and kidney-specific outcomes.

