Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Identifying significant and relevant events during pediatric transport: a modified Delphi study
Anna C Gunz1, Sonny Dhanani, Hillary Whyte
11Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 2Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3Department of Paediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada. 4Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 5Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Insights
Researchers identified 52 significant indicators for pediatric patient transport events. This list aids quality improvement and clinical research in transport medicine, enhancing patient safety during transfers to specialized centers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric transport medicine
- Healthcare quality improvement
- Patient safety research
Background:
- Pediatric patients require specialized care, necessitating transport to dedicated centers.
- Patient transport increases risks of deterioration and life-threatening events.
- Previous studies lacked standardized indicators for significant transport events.
Purpose of the Study:
- Identify and evaluate indicators of significant events during pediatric patient transport.
- Develop a relevant list of indicators for future transport medicine research.
- Establish a consensus on critical indicators for pediatric transport.
Main Methods:
- Modified Delphi study with four iterations.
- Involved an interdisciplinary panel of Canadian healthcare providers with transport experience.
- Systematic evaluation and consensus-building on 57 proposed indicators.
Main Results:
- Expert panel comprised 16 physicians and 17 non-physicians from 10 institutions.
- Evaluated 57 indicators, including 26 novel ones.
- Achieved consensus on 52 significant and relevant indicators for pediatric transport.
Conclusions:
- A systematic Delphi approach yielded an inclusive list of indicators.
- The developed indicator list is suitable for pediatric transport quality improvement.
- The indicators will support clinical research initiatives in pediatric transport medicine.
Objectives:
Children must often be transported to dedicated pediatric centers to receive specialized medical and surgical care, which places them at risk for significant deterioration and life-threatening events. Studies designed to identify and mitigate these events have been limited by variability in the selection and definition of significant events. The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate indicators that represent significant events during the transport of pediatric patients and are relevant to future research initiatives in transport medicine.
Design:
We conducted a modified Delphi study consisting of four iterations.
Setting:
The expert panel included Canadian, interdisciplinary healthcare providers with transport experience.
Interventions:
In the first Delphi iteration, experts suggested indicators for consideration and evaluated proposed indicators from the literature and introduced by the study steering committee. In subsequent iterations, respondents reevaluated all indicators that had not yet achieved a priori-defined consensus; group comments and aggregate scores for each indicator from previous iterations were provided.
Measurements And Main Results:
The expert panel consisted of 16 physicians and 17 nonphysician healthcare providers from 10 Canadian institutions. In total, the panel evaluated 57 indicators, including 26 not previously presented in the literature. The expert panel determined 52 were significant and relevant to future studies in pediatric transport. The final indicator list includes trigger tools (interventions, physiological markers, and laboratory values) and team member safety and process issues.
Conclusions:
Using a systematic, modified Delphi approach, we developed an inclusive list of indicators for application to pediatric transport-related quality improvement and clinical research projects.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

