Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Visual and Microscopic Evaluation of Streptomyces Developmental Mutants
Published on: September 12, 2018
Whatever happened to the 'mad, bad' scientist? Overturning the stereotype
1University of New South Wales, Australia; University of Tasmania, Australia R.Haynes@unsw.edu.au roslynn.haynes@utas.edu.au.
Abstract:
The cluster of myths relating to the pursuit of knowledge has perpetuated the archetype of the alchemist/scientist as sinister, dangerous, possibly mad and threatening to society's values. Shelley's Frankenstein provided imagery and a vocabulary universally invoked in relation to scientific discoveries and technological innovation. The reasons for the longevity of this seemingly antiquated, semiotic imagery are discussed. In the twenty-first century, this stereotype has been radically revised, even overturned. Scientists are now rarely objects of fear or mockery. Mathematicians, both real-life and fictional, are discussed here as being representative of scientists now depicted empathically. This article examines possible sociological reasons for this reversal; what the revisionist image suggests about society's changed attitudes to science; and what might be the substitute fears and sources of horror.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Stereotype Content Model
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
The Stanford Prison Experiment

