Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

06:17
Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay
Published on: February 28, 2025
1.3K
Estimating influence of cofragmentation on peptide quantification and identification in iTRAQ experiments by
Honglan Li1, Kyu-Baek Hwang, Dong-Gi Mun
1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University , Seoul 156-743, Republic of Korea.
Journal of Proteome Research
|June 12, 2014
Summary
Isobaric tag quantification in proteomics can be inaccurate due to cofragmentation. This study developed a method to correct quantification ratios and identify reliable differentially expressed peptides (DEPs) from cofragmented spectra, reducing false positives.
Area of Science:
- Proteomics
- Mass Spectrometry
- Quantitative Biology
Background:
- Isobaric tag-based quantification (e.g., iTRAQ, TMT) offers high throughput in proteomics.
- Cofragmentation of peptides in mass spectrometry leads to inaccurate quantification and identification.
- Filtering spectra with low precursor isolation purity (PIP) reduces experimental coverage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the impact of cofragmentation on peptide quantification and identification in iTRAQ experiments.
- To develop a method for calculating corrected cutoff values for identifying differentially expressed peptides (DEPs) from cofragmented spectra.
- To reduce false positives in DEP identification using isobaric labeling techniques.
Main Methods:
- Generated multiplexed spectra with varying PIP by mixing 4-plex iTRAQ-labeled gastric tumor-normal tissue pair MS/MS spectra.
- Evaluated peptide identification accuracy using three database search engines (MODa, MS-GF+, Proteome Discoverer).
- Estimated quantification distortions and developed a corrected cutoff calculation method based on PIP and error probabilities.
Main Results:
- Over 99% of multiplexed spectra with PIP > 80% were correctly identified.
- Cofragmentation compressed cancer-to-normal expression ratios in 74% of spectra, with some showing ratio inflation.
- Applying corrected cutoffs to spectra with PIP >= 70% identified reliable DEPs, removing ~25% of potential false positives.
Conclusions:
- Cofragmentation significantly impacts peptide quantification accuracy in isobaric tag-based proteomics.
- The developed simulation and corrected cutoff calculation methods effectively reduce false positives in DEP identification.
- This approach enhances the reliability of quantitative proteomics using isobaric labeling techniques.

