Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Position learning in chicks.

G Vallortigara1, M Zanforlin

  • 1Instituto di Psicologia, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.

Behavioural Processes
|June 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Chicks learned faster using relative box positions when boxes were close. Absolute position learning improved when boxes were farther apart, though overall learning took longer.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visually-naïve chicks prefer agents that move as if constrained by a bilateral body-plan.

Cognition·2018
Same author

Spontaneous preference for visual cues of animacy in naïve domestic chicks: The case of speed changes.

Cognition·2016
Same author

Roots of a social brain: developmental models of emerging animacy-detection mechanisms.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2014
Same author

Numerical discrimination by frogs (Bombina orientalis).

Animal cognition·2014
Same author

The development of responses to novel-coloured objects in male and female domestic chicks.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same journal

Flexible Time-Series Analysis: A Dynamically Aware Method for Inferring Directed Dependencies in Behavioral Data.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Effects of group size and landmarks on escape behavior of three fish species.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Vocal individuality in two sympatric seabird species: The role of developmental strategy, analytical approach and sample size.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

No evidence of sex-specific responses to chemosensory risk assessment cues in Harts rivulus.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Exploratory responses of rats to cage-mates and conspecifics from another cage in a habituation-dishabituation paradigm with multiple habituation stimuli.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Observation of drinking behaviour in the Ursus arctos marsicanus at a tree cavity (dendrotelm) in the central Apennines.

Behavioural processes·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Comparative psychology
  • Animal cognition
  • Behavioral neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding spatial learning in altricial birds is crucial for cognitive research.
  • Discrimination learning paradigms assess how animals process environmental cues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate chick spatial discrimination learning based on relative versus absolute positional cues.
  • To determine how spatial separation influences the efficacy of different learning strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Chicks were trained to differentiate two similar boxes.
  • Training conditions varied based on box proximity (close vs. far).
  • Learning was assessed using relative (inter-box) and absolute (environment-referenced) positional information.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Relative position learning was significantly faster than absolute position learning when boxes were proximate.
  • When boxes were distant, learning required more trials for both methods.
  • The performance difference between relative and absolute learning diminished with increased spatial separation.

Conclusions:

  • Chicks prioritize relative spatial cues for rapid learning in close proximity.
  • Spatial separation impacts the salience and effectiveness of different positional cues in avian learning.
  • Findings contribute to understanding the flexibility of spatial cognition in young birds.