Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

10:20
Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
Published on: March 12, 2013
13.7K
A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes
Thomas M Newsome1, William J Ripple1
1Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
The Journal of Animal Ecology
|June 17, 2014
Summary
Large carnivores like wolves influence predator distribution across North America. Wolf presence suppresses coyotes, allowing red foxes to thrive, demonstrating a continental-scale ecological cascade.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Wildlife Conservation
- Population Dynamics
Background:
- Top-down ecological processes, including competitive killing and intraguild predation, can shape terrestrial predator spatial distribution.
- Large-scale studies demonstrating these effects are rare, particularly concerning North American canids.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the continental-scale spatial effects of grey wolf (Canis lupus) presence on coyote (Canis latrans) and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) densities.
- To determine if wolf extirpation has caused shifts in the distribution of subordinate predators.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of fur return data from eight North American jurisdictions.
- Statistical testing to correlate wolf presence/absence with red fox and coyote densities.
Main Results:
- A continent-wide cascade effect was observed: coyotes outnumbered red foxes in areas with wolf extirpation, while red foxes outnumbered coyotes where wolves were present.
- A 200 km transition zone at the edge of wolf distribution showed weakened top-down control, likely due to coyote dispersal into areas with low wolf density.
Conclusions:
- Wolf restoration can significantly impact co-occurring predator populations across North America.
- Large, continuous carnivore habitats are crucial for maintaining among-carnivore cascades and effective top-down mesopredator control.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
17.0K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
17.0K
Threats to Biodiversity
21.7K
There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
21.7K
Conservation of Small Populations
14.3K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
14.3K
Trophic Levels
28.4K
All organisms in an ecosystem occupy a trophic level in the food chain. The lowest level consists of primary producers, which synthesize their food from either solar or chemical energy. Each subsequent level obtains energy from the levels below. Detritivores can occupy any of the levels above primary producers.
28.4K
Competition
21.3K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.3K
Keystone Species
20.7K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
20.7K

