Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.1K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.1K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

582
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
582
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

6.3K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
6.3K
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

12.3K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
12.3K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

5.8K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
5.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pediatric healthcare worker perspectives on implementation of a secure firearm storage program: a qualitative study.

BMC pediatrics·2026
Same author

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Afternoon panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Nudging implementation of low tidal volume ventilation: a stepped wedge, cluster randomized trial.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same author

A mixed methods evaluation of mechanisms for facilitation in pediatric primary care.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

STRONGER INSTRUMENTS VIA INTEGER PROGRAMMING IN AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF LATE PRETERM BIRTH OUTCOMES.

The annals of applied statistics·2026
Same author

On the mixed-model analysis of covariance in cluster-randomized trials.

Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.1K

Using an instrumental variable to test for unmeasured confounding.

Zijian Guo1, Jing Cheng, Scott A Lorch

  • 1Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.

Statistics in Medicine
|June 17, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new test to detect unmeasured confounding in observational studies using an instrumental variable (IV). The developed test offers accurate error rates and deeper insights compared to existing methods like the Durbin-Wu-Hausman test.

Keywords:
comparative effectivenessconfoundinginstrumental variablesobservational study

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.1K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Econometrics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Unmeasured confounding is a significant challenge in observational studies, potentially biasing results.
  • Instrumental variables (IV) offer a potential solution by isolating exogenous variation.
  • Existing methods for detecting unmeasured confounding may have limitations, especially with treatment effect heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel statistical test for detecting unmeasured confounding in the presence of an instrumental variable.
  • To compare the performance of the new test against the widely used Durbin-Wu-Hausman test.
  • To provide a more insightful method for understanding the nature of unmeasured confounding.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new hypothesis test for unmeasured confounding using an instrumental variable.
  • Theoretical analysis of the test's properties, including type I error rate.
  • Simulation studies to compare the new test with the Durbin-Wu-Hausman test under various scenarios.
  • Application of the test to a real-world observational study.

Main Results:

  • The proposed instrumental variable test for unmeasured confounding demonstrates a correct type I error rate.
  • The Durbin-Wu-Hausman test can exhibit inflated type I error rates when treatment effect heterogeneity is present.
  • The new test provides richer insights into the characteristics of unmeasured confounding compared to the Durbin-Wu-Hausman test.
  • The test was successfully applied to an observational study on neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The developed instrumental variable test is a reliable tool for detecting unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
  • This method offers an improvement over existing tests, particularly in the presence of treatment effect heterogeneity.
  • The findings have implications for improving the validity of causal inference in observational research, exemplified by the NICU study.