The meat industry: do we think and behave globally or locally?
K E Belk1, D R Woerner1, R J Delmore1
1Center for Meat Safety and Quality, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1171, USA.
Abstract:
For generations, those that produce livestock and meat generally felt that their country or geographical region (i.e., provenance) reflected a basis for product differentiation. This occurs to the extent that geography of production often is considered a "brand." For example, there exists "U.S. Grain-Fed Beef" or "Kobe Black Wagyu" or "Uruguayan Grass-Fed Lamb" or "Danish Pork." However, for most meat trade, industry has evolved beyond this. With the exception perhaps of farms onto which livestock are born, meat company's profits are not generally tied to geographical considerations. Most major companies (e.g., JBS, Marfrig, Tyson, Cargill, Danish Crown, Nippon Meat Packers, etc.) operate in multiple countries and represent to consumers the production of a number of locations. However, there also now exist entrepreneurial options for meat production and "local" sales, albeit at lesser volumes. This discussion explores "global" and "local" meat marketing options.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
What is Behavior?
Global Regulatory Systems
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry
Social Proof
Confirmation Biases


