Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

710
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
710
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

594
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
594
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.8K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.2K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.0K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.0K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

2.5K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Skew-normal Bayesian spatial heterogeneity panel data models.

Journal of applied statistics·2022
Same author

Joint frailty modeling of time-to-event data to elicit the evolution pathway of events: a generalized linear mixed model approach.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2021
Same author

Is Health Contagious?-Based on Empirical Evidence From China Family Panel Studies' Data.

Frontiers in public health·2021
Same author

Improved CRISPR genome editing using small highly active and specific engineered RNA-guided nucleases.

Nature communications·2021
Same author

Multi-Epitope Vaccine Design Using an Immunoinformatic Approach for SARS-CoV-2.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Bone Autophagy: A Potential Way of Exercise-Mediated Meg3/P62/Runx2 Pathway to Regulate Bone Formation in T2DM Mice.

Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy·2021
Same journal

A Bayesian functional concurrent zero-inflated Dirichlet-multinomial regression model with application to infant microbiome.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Towards optimal environmental policies: policy learning under arbitrary bipartite network interference.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Multilevel functional quantile principal component analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Adaptive transfer learning for time-to-event modeling with applications in disease risk assessment.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

High-dimensional test for one-sided hypotheses.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

NBSR: a Negative Binomial Softmax Regression model for microRNA-seq data analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

6.3K

Inference on differences between classes using cluster-specific contrasts of mixed effects.

Shu Kay Ng1, Geoffrey J McLachlan2, Kui Wang2

  • 1School of Medicine, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, QLD 4131, Australia s.ng@griffith.edu.au.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|June 26, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel bioinformatics method for detecting differentially expressed (DE) genes. The new contrast-based approach improves gene ranking and increases power in multiple hypothesis testing for disease research.

Keywords:
ContrastDifferential expressionMixture modelRandom effects modeling

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

6.3K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Detecting differentially expressed (DE) genes is crucial for understanding diseases and developing treatments.
  • Current methods for DE gene detection face limitations in ranking and statistical power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel contrast-based approach for detecting DE genes.
  • To improve gene ranking and enhance power in multiple hypothesis testing for DE gene identification.

Main Methods:

  • A novel test statistic is developed using weighted, cluster-specific contrasts from a mixture model's mixed effects.
  • Gene-specific mixed effects are incorporated into cluster-specific contrasts, making soft gene assignments to clusters non-critical.
  • P-values are calculated for false discovery rate (FDR) control in multiple hypothesis testing.

Main Results:

  • The proposed contrast-based approach outperforms existing methods in ranking genes by evidence against the null hypothesis.
  • It achieves a lower proportion of false discoveries in ranking contexts.
  • It demonstrates higher power for a specified FDR level in multiple hypothesis testing.

Conclusions:

  • The novel contrast-based method offers a superior approach for identifying differentially expressed genes.
  • This method enhances both gene ranking accuracy and statistical power in complex biological datasets.