Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: September 13, 2022
Sacrospinous colpopexy using Masson luethy needle holder
Ahmed Ibrahim1, Osama Eltohamy1, Moustafa Ibrahim1
1Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
The Masson luethy needle holder simplifies sacrospinous colpopexy (SSC) suture placement, significantly reducing operative time and blood loss. This technique offers a more efficient approach to correcting apical support defects in women undergoing SSC.
Area of Science:
- Urogynecology
- Pelvic reconstructive surgery
- Surgical innovation
Background:
- Sacrospinous colpopexy (SSC) is a key surgical procedure for apical support defects.
- Suture placement during SSC can be technically challenging, impacting operative efficiency.
- Existing methods for suture placement may prolong surgery and increase blood loss.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using the Masson luethy needle holder for suture placement in SSC.
- To compare the operative time and blood loss associated with the Masson luethy needle holder versus the Deschamps ligature carrier.
- To determine if the Masson luethy needle holder simplifies the SSC procedure.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study comparing SSC using the Masson luethy needle holder (Group I) with the Deschamps ligature carrier (Group II).
- 104 women with uterovaginal prolapse or post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse were enrolled.
- Key outcomes measured included operative time, blood loss, complications, recurrence, and cure rates.
Main Results:
- Group I (Masson luethy needle holder) had significantly shorter mean operative time (109±33 min) compared to Group II (206±67 min).
- Suture placement time was markedly reduced in Group I (47±14 min) versus Group II (153±46 min).
- Mean operative blood loss was significantly lower in Group I (582±349 ml) than in Group II (985±463 ml).
- Perioperative complications, recurrence, and cure rates were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- The Masson luethy needle holder streamlines suture placement during SSC.
- This technique leads to a significant reduction in overall operative time for sacrospinous colpopexy.
- The Masson luethy needle holder offers a more efficient and less bloody alternative for SSC procedures.
More Related Videos
03:30Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
04:01The Modified Single-working Portal Technique Using Lasso-loop Stitch with Needle for Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair
Published on: August 8, 2025