Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Management of complicated and uncomplicated acute type B dissection. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Konstantinos G Moulakakis1, Spyridon N Mylonas1, Ilias Dalainas1
11 Department of Vascular Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 2 The Collaborative Research Group, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia ; 3 Vascular Unit, 2nd Clinic of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Insights
For acute complicated type B aortic dissection, endovascular repair offers better survival than open surgery. Conservative management is effective for uncomplicated cases, but more research is needed on long-term outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Acute type B aortic dissection management poses significant clinical challenges.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate treatment options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze medical, surgical, and endovascular treatments for acute type B aortic dissection.
- To compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment modalities.
Main Methods:
- An extensive literature search was performed on databases from January 2006 to November 2013.
- Studies with fewer than 15 patients were excluded from the meta-analysis.
Main Results:
- For acute complicated type B dissection, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) had a 7.3% mortality rate versus 19.0% for open repair.
- Conservative management for acute uncomplicated type B dissection showed a 2.4% mortality rate.
- TEVAR demonstrated lower rates of cerebrovascular events and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) compared to open repair in complicated cases.
Conclusions:
- TEVAR offers superior short-term survival for acute complicated type B aortic dissection compared to open surgery.
- Open repair remains crucial for cases unsuitable for TEVAR, with ongoing durability concerns for endovascular techniques.
- TEVAR shows promise for aortic remodeling and survival compared to medical therapy alone; further RCTs are needed for uncomplicated dissections.
Background:
The management of acute type B dissection represents a clinical challenge. We undertook a systematic review of the available literature regarding medical, surgical and endovascular treatments of acute type B aortic dissection and combined the eligible studies into a meta-analysis.
Methods:
An extensive electronic health database search was performed on all articles published from January 2006 up to November 2013 describing the management of acute type B aortic dissection. Studies including less than 15 patients were excluded.
Results:
ACUTE COMPLICATED TYPE B DISSECTION: overall, 2,531 patients were treated with endovascular repair (TEVAR) and the pooled rate for 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 7.3%. The pooled estimates for cerebrovascular events, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and total neurologic events were 3.9%, 3.1% and 7.3%, respectively. A total of 1,276 patients underwent open surgical repair and the pooled rate for 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 19.0%. The pooled rate for cerebrovascular events was 6.8%, for SCI 3.3% and for total neurologic complications 9.8%. Acute uncomplicated type B dissection: outcome of 2,347 patients who underwent conservative medical management were analyzed. The pooled 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate was 2.4%. The pooled rate for cerebrovascular events was 1%, for SCI 0.8% and for overall neurologic complications 2%.
Conclusions:
Endovascular repair provides a superior 30-day/in-hospital survival for acute complicated type B aortic dissection compared to surgical aortic reconstruction. However, open repair still has a significant role as endovascular repair is not applicable in all patients and there remains concerns regarding the durability of this technique. TEVAR seems to have a more favorable outcome regarding aortic remodeling and the aortic-specific survival rate when compared with medical therapy alone. Randomized controlled trials focusing on the prognostic factors of early and late complications in uncomplicated type B dissections are needed.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

