Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
Measuring postural stability in young children with cerebral palsy: a comparison of 2 instruments
Katharine Elizabeth Randall1, Doreen J Bartlett, Sarah Westcott McCoy
1Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Program (Ms Randall), and School of Physical Therapy (Dr Bartlett), Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research (Dr Bartlett), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (Dr Westcott), Division of Physical Therapy, University of Washington, Seattle.
Insights
The Early Clinical Assessment of Balance (ECAB) is a superior measure for assessing postural stability in children with cerebral palsy (CP), showing strong validity and reliability compared to the Pediatric Reach Test.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric physical therapy
- Neurological rehabilitation
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often experience impaired postural stability, impacting their motor function.
- Accurate assessment of postural stability is crucial for effective intervention planning in pediatric CP.
- Existing measures require rigorous evaluation for clinical utility in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the construct validity, interrater and test-retest reliability of the Pediatric Reach Test and the Early Clinical Assessment of Balance (ECAB).
- To assess the relationship between these measures and the Gross Motor Function Measure, 66-item version, Basal and Ceiling approach (GMFM-66-B&C).
- To determine the clinical utility of postural stability measures for children with CP.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 28 children with CP, aged 2-7 years, participated in two assessment sessions spaced two weeks apart.
- Two independent assessors evaluated the participants during the initial assessment to evaluate interrater reliability.
- Construct validity was assessed by comparing the measures with the GMFM-66-B&C.
Main Results:
- Both the Pediatric Reach Test and ECAB demonstrated strong construct validity (rs of 0.88) and correlated highly with the GMFM-66-B&C (rs > 0.95).
- The ECAB exhibited superior interrater and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.98) compared to the Pediatric Reach Test (0.87-0.94).
- The ECAB showed reduced measurement error and smaller minimal detectable change values.
Conclusions:
- The Early Clinical Assessment of Balance (ECAB) is recommended as a more effective measure for assessing postural stability in children with cerebral palsy.
- The ECAB's superior reliability and lower measurement error support its clinical utility in this population.
- This study provides evidence-based guidance for selecting appropriate tools for evaluating postural control in pediatric CP.
Purpose:
To compare construct validity, interrater and test-retest reliabilities of the Pediatric Reach Test and the Early Clinical Assessment of Balance (ECAB), and their relationships with the Gross Motor Function Measure, 66-item version, Basal and Ceiling approach (GMFM-66-B&C) to appraise clinical utility of postural stability measures for children with cerebral palsy (CP).
Methods:
A total of 28 children with CP, 2 to 7 years old, across all functional ability levels participated in 2 assessments over 2 weeks. Two assessors scored the measures during the first assessment.
Results:
Both measures demonstrated construct validity, rs of 0.88 (P < .001). Both measures correlated with GMFM-66-B&C, rs > 0.95. Interrater and test-retest reliabilities were stronger for the ECAB than for the Pediatric Reach Test (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.98 vs 0.87-0.94). The ECAB demonstrated lower measurement error and proportionately smaller minimal detectable change values.
Conclusion:
The ECAB is considered the better measure of postural stability among children with CP.
More Related Videos
08:24Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
14:52Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Published on: December 11, 2013