A population-based tissue probability map-driven level set method for fully automated mammographic density estimations
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026
Reconstruction of 3-Dimensional Histology Volume and its Application to Study Mouse Mammary Glands
Published on: July 26, 2014
Youngwoo Kim1, Byung Woo Hong2, Seung Ja Kim3
1Interdisciplinary Program of Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea 110-744 and Center for Medical-IT Convergence Technology Research, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, South Korea 443-270.
Purpose:
A major challenge when distinguishing glandular tissues on mammograms, especially for area-based estimations, lies in determining a boundary on a hazy transition zone from adipose to glandular tissues. This stems from the nature of mammography, which is a projection of superimposed tissues consisting of different structures. In this paper, the authors present a novel segmentation scheme which incorporates the learned prior knowledge of experts into a level set framework for fully automated mammographic density estimations.
Methods:
The authors modeled the learned knowledge as a population-based tissue probability map (PTPM) that was designed to capture the classification of experts' visual systems. The PTPM was constructed using an image database of a selected population consisting of 297 cases. Three mammogram experts extracted regions for dense and fatty tissues on digital mammograms, which was an independent subset used to create a tissue probability map for each ROI based on its local statistics. This tissue class probability was taken as a prior in the Bayesian formulation and was incorporated into a level set framework as an additional term to control the evolution and followed the energy surface designed to reflect experts' knowledge as well as the regional statistics inside and outside of the evolving contour.
Results:
A subset of 100 digital mammograms, which was not used in constructing the PTPM, was used to validate the performance. The energy was minimized when the initial contour reached the boundary of the dense and fatty tissues, as defined by experts. The correlation coefficient between mammographic density measurements made by experts and measurements by the proposed method was 0.93, while that with the conventional level set was 0.47.
Conclusions:
The proposed method showed a marked improvement over the conventional level set method in terms of accuracy and reliability. This result suggests that the proposed method successfully incorporated the learned knowledge of the experts' visual systems and has potential to be used as an automated and quantitative tool for estimations of mammographic breast density levels.
