Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
NOAC in acute coronary syndrome and AF?
Maria Niespialowska-Steuden, Peter Collins, Charis Costopoulos
1E&N Hertfordshire NHS Trust, UK. d.gorog@imperial.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. New treatments, in the form of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) that reduce thrombotic risk are now available for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Warfarin has been the cornerstone of thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF, but treatment is cumbersome, inconvenient and often unreliable, with fluctuating time in therapeutic range. Thrombotic events also continue to occur in a significant number of ACS patients despite antiplatelet therapy. Thus there is an unfilled need to reduce thrombotic events in ACS and AF patients. NOAC comprise direct factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, rivaroxaban, darexaban, edoxaban), direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and PAR-1 antagonists (vorapaxar, atopaxar). In this review, we compare and contrast NOACs and review their individual and specific clinical trial database in ACS and AF. In the setting of ACS, the role of NOAC is unclear, as any reduction in ischemic events appears to be offset by hemorrhagic risk. However, NOAC have a definite place in the treatment of patients with non-valvular AF, where they are at least as effective, if not superior to warfarin.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...

