Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Oral Anticoagulation With or Without Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized
Mattia Galli1, Mattia Vinciguerra2, Claudio Laudani3
1Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy; Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.
Background:
The optimal antithrombotic therapy for patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who also require long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) remains uncertain.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OAC monotherapy compared with OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in CCS patients with an indication for long-term anticoagulation.
Methods:
Randomized trials comparing OAC monotherapy with OAC plus SAPT in patients with CCS and indication for long-term OAC from the PubMed, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to November 10, 2025 were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. HRs and 95% CIs were estimated through a random-effects meta-analytical framework. The primary efficacy endpoint was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events, and the primary safety endpoint was any bleeding.
Results:
Six trials comprising 5,924 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 2.3 years (Q1-Q3: 1.3-2.9 years), the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.2 (Q1-Q3: 4.0-4.6), and the median time from revascularization to randomization 3.8 years (Q1-Q3: 3.2-4.4 years). Compared with OAC plus SAPT, OAC monotherapy showed similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (6.8% vs 8.2%; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.64-1.09; I2 =23%) and reduced risk of bleeding (8.9% vs 16.1%; HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.44-0.55; I2 =8%). OAC monotherapy also reduced cardiovascular death (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.48-0.97; I2 =0%), net adverse clinical events (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.47-0.78; I2 =66%), and major bleeding (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.32-0.66; I2 =47%) compared with OAC plus SAPT. There were no significant differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality.
Conclusions:
In patients with CCS requiring long-term OAC, OAC monotherapy was associated with reduced bleeding, cardiovascular death, and net adverse clinical events compared with OAC plus SAPT. (Anticoagulation Alone vs Anticoagulation Plus Antiplatelet Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation With Stable Coronary Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials; CRD420251174643).
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care