Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

889
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
889
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

26.2K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
26.2K
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality01:30

Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality

1.5K
Social cognitive perspectives on personality emphasize the importance of conscious awareness, beliefs, expectations, and goals in shaping behavior. These perspectives incorporate behaviorist principles, such as learning through reinforcement and conditioning, but extend beyond them by highlighting human reasoning and planning. Unlike traditional behaviorist views, social cognitive theory focuses on how individuals reflect on their past experiences and plan for future outcomes by considering...
1.5K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

763
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
763
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy01:24

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

789
Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert...
789
Cognition and Behavior01:23

Cognition and Behavior

483
Social psychology examines the complex interplay between individual mental processes and social interactions. Historically, the field was divided into two domains: social behavior and social cognition. Researchers focusing on social behavior analyzed actions within social contexts, such as conformity, aggression, or cooperation. Meanwhile, social cognition researchers investigated how people perceive, interpret, and mentally represent their social environments. However, modern perspectives no...
483

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying water hydrogen bonding from the surface electrostatic potential at varying iso-density contours.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Conceptual Spaces for Conceptual Engineering? Feminism as a Case Study.

Review of philosophy and psychology·2025
Same author

No Boundaries and Naturally-Defined Boundaries Obtained via the Electrostatic Potential.

Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry·2025
Same author

Inference to the best neuroscientific explanation.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2024
Same author

Editorial: Beyond formal models of reasoning about explanations.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

Similarity-based reasoning in conceptual spaces.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same journal

From silenced shock to strategic resilience: a longitudinal qualitative study of nurse residents' trajectory in coping with patient verbal abuse.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Validation of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) for forest firefighters: implications for human-technology interaction and occupational safety in the future of work.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of the football emotion scale for Chinese youth players: a psychometric study.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

From online engagement to offline action: how social media environmental engagement shapes university students' pro-environmental citizenship through intrinsic motivation and personal norms.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

The multidimensional inventory of religious/spiritual wellbeing in Hungarian language: psychometric properties and initial validation.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Effects of occupational factors on depression in Chinese veterans: a fsQCA study based on 2022 CFPS data.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Rationality: a social-epistemology perspective.

Sylvia Wenmackers1, Danny E P Vanpoucke2, Igor Douven1

  • 1Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.

Frontiers in Psychology
|July 5, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human rationality is often studied individually. This research explores how social interactions, specifically epistemic interactions, can lead to inconsistent beliefs within a population, moving beyond the individualistic perspective.

Keywords:
beliefscomputer simulationsinconsistencyopinion dynamicsprobabilityrationalitysocial epistemologytheory

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

4.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

4.7K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of science
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Social epistemology

Background:

  • Traditional studies of human rationality focus on the individual.
  • Social epistemology highlights the role of interactions in shaping beliefs.
  • Previous work modeled risks of belief inconsistency from social interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the population-level dynamics of belief consistency.
  • To extend the analysis of social-epistemic interactions beyond individual agents.
  • To understand how group interactions affect overall rationality.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a formal model to analyze belief dynamics.
  • Examining the propagation of belief states within a population.
  • Simulating social-epistemic interactions.

Main Results:

  • Social-epistemic interactions can lead to widespread belief inconsistency.
  • The dynamics reveal patterns of belief state changes across populations.
  • Initial consistent beliefs can evolve into inconsistent states at a population level.

Conclusions:

  • Social interactions significantly impact population-level rationality.
  • The study provides insights into the collective dynamics of belief formation.
  • Rethinking rationality requires considering social and interactive factors.