Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Bias01:22

Bias

6.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.2K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

1.1K
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
1.1K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.3K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lineage-specific transmission and spatial clustering of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, in 2019-23: a population-based genomic study.

The Lancet. Microbe·2026
Same author

Comparison of phylogenetic metrics of transmission between symptomatic and asymptomatic tuberculosis in individuals who were incarcerated in Brazil in 2008-24: a retrospective genomic epidemiology study.

The Lancet. Microbe·2026
Same author

SAASI: Sampling Aware Ancestral State Inference.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

e3SIM: Epidemiological-ecological-evolutionary simulation framework for genomic epidemiology.

Methods in ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Genomic epidemiology of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> in Malawi: using global phylogeography to understand the impact of geographically focused interventions.

Microbial genomics·2026
Same author

The global phylogeography of rapidly expanding multidrug resistant Ural lineage 4.2 Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Opioid use disorder and hospital readmission in the United States from 2010 to 2022: Primary reasons and the complex interplay of comorbid conditions.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026
Same journal

Impact of medicaid waivers on medication for opioid use disorders in residential facilities: Evidence from twenty-five states.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026
Same journal

Mental and somatic multimorbidity among individuals with alcohol use disorder: A sex-stratified registry study.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026
Same journal

Monitoring novel psychoactive substance trends on social media: Analysis of discussions and dashboard implementation.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026
Same journal

A meta-analysis on the relationship between cultural identity and substance use among indigenous youth.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026
Same journal

Examining heterogeneity in pathways between alcohol-related factors and drinking during topiramate pharmacotherapy: A person-specific analysis.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

8.2K

Errors in reported degrees and respondent driven sampling: implications for bias.

Harriet L Mills1, Samuel Johnson2, Matthew Hickman3

  • 1MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Dynamics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.

Drug and Alcohol Dependence
|July 8, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) estimates can be biased if individuals inaccurately report their network size. This impacts tracking trends in hard-to-reach populations, especially those with fewer connections.

Keywords:
At-risk populationsContact network sizeRespondent driven sampling

More Related Videos

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.1K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

8.2K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.1K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Network Analysis
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) is crucial for surveying hard-to-reach populations like people who inject drugs (PWID).
  • RDS estimates require adjustments for non-random sampling based on reported network size (degree).
  • Accurate degree reporting is assumed for unbiased prevalence and incidence estimations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of misreported network sizes on RDS estimates.
  • To simulate Respondent Driven Sampling surveys under various degree misreporting scenarios.
  • To assess the sensitivity of adjusted RDS estimates to reporting inaccuracies.

Main Methods:

  • Generated contact networks with simulated degree misreporting patterns.
  • Simulated Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) surveys on these networks.
  • Analyzed the bias in adjusted estimates under different misreporting conditions.

Main Results:

  • Inaccurate degree reporting introduces significant and variable bias into RDS estimates.
  • Simulations showed potential over- or under-estimation of prevalence changes by up to 25% in paired surveys.
  • Estimates are particularly sensitive to inaccuracies in degree data from low-degree individuals.

Conclusions:

  • There is a substantial risk of bias in Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) estimates when network sizes are not accurately reported.
  • This bias is critical for analyzing trends in population prevalence and behavior using consecutive RDS samples.
  • Refining RDS questionnaires for high-resolution degree data, especially from low-degree individuals, and increasing sample sizes are recommended.