Related Experiment Videos
Tear gas--harassing agent or toxic chemical weapon?
JAMA
|August 4, 1989
Summary
Tear gas, including o-chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile, causes indiscriminate harm and lacks sufficient toxicological data on long-term effects. Its use raises concerns about severe injury and potential mutagenicity, questioning its ethical application.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Chemical Warfare Agents
- Public Health
Background:
- Tear gas is widely used for crowd control and subduing criminals.
- Common agents include o-chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile (CS gas) and omega-chloroacetophenone (CN gas).
- Claims of transient effects contrast with observed indiscriminate and incorrect usage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the toxicological profile of tear gas agents.
- To assess the adequacy of existing data on long-term health consequences.
- To evaluate the circumstances surrounding tear gas use and its implications.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing toxicological data and in vitro test results.
- Analysis of documented injuries and adverse effects from tear gas deployment.
- Examination of historical and ethical considerations regarding chemical weapon use.
Main Results:
- Severe traumatic and lethal toxic injuries have been documented.
- Toxicological data are insufficient regarding pulmonary, carcinogenic, and reproductive effects.
- In vitro tests indicate o-chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile is clastogenic and mutagenic.
- Epidemiologic investigation is hindered by the nature of tear gas deployment.
Conclusions:
- The use of tear gas presents significant risks of uncontrolled exposure and severe injury.
- There is a critical need for comprehensive toxicological assessment of tear gas agents.
- The ethical justification for tear gas use requires renewed international debate and scrutiny.