Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

901
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
901
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

6.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
6.7K
First Impression01:09

First Impression

424
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
424
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The differential role of language and executive functions in the relation between socioeconomic status and theory of mind in preschool and school-aged children.

Trends in neuroscience and education·2026
Same author

When Matilda shows up: The double-edged impact of women researchers' media visibility in management science.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for an illusory truth effect and its determinants.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Older adults can outperform younger adults in creative problem solving.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Domain-general and domain-specific cognitive factors mediating the relationship between math anxiety and mathematical performance in primary school children.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The development of media truth discernment and fake news detection is related to the development of reasoning during adolescence.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K

Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making?

Anaïs Osmont1, Mathieu Cassotti, Marine Agogué

  • 1Laboratory for the Psychology of Child Development and Education, CNRS UMR 8240, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Laboratoire A. Binet, 46 rue Saint Jacques, 75005, Paris, France.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|July 18, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision-makers avoid unknown risks, showing ambiguity aversion. This study found that while ambiguity aversion leads to choosing sure options, framing effects still influence choices, especially in ambiguous situations.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Behavioral economics
  • Decision science

Background:

  • Decision-makers exhibit ambiguity aversion, a bias against options with unknown risk levels.
  • The presentation of choices significantly impacts human decision-making.
  • Understanding how ambiguity aversion interacts with framing effects is crucial for explaining choice behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of ambiguity aversion on the framing effect in financial decision-making.
  • To examine how manipulating uncertainty levels affects choice preferences.
  • To determine if framing effects persist under conditions of ambiguity.

Main Methods:

  • A financial decision-making task was designed with manipulated frames and uncertainty levels.
  • Participants (n=37) chose between a certain option and a gamble with clear or ambiguous probabilities.
  • Ambiguity aversion and framing effects were analyzed based on participant choices.

Main Results:

  • A consistent preference for the sure option was observed in the ambiguity condition, irrespective of the frame.
  • Framing effects were present in both risk (clear probabilities) and ambiguity (unknown probabilities) conditions.
  • The framing effect in the ambiguity condition was unidirectional, leading to more extreme choices rather than preference reversals.

Conclusions:

  • Ambiguity aversion strongly influences decision-making, promoting a preference for certainty when risks are unknown.
  • Framing effects remain influential even when choices involve ambiguity, though their nature may change.
  • The findings highlight the complex interplay between risk perception, ambiguity, and framing in economic choices.