Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

06:26
Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
Published on: December 9, 2025
344
Volume changes of maxillary sinus augmentations over time: a systematic review
Summary
Graft volume reduction occurs after sinus augmentation (SA). Bone substitutes (BS) or composite grafts (CG) show less volume loss than autogenous bone (AB), with no impact on implant survival.
Area of Science:
- Dental implantology
- Regenerative medicine
- Biomaterials science
Background:
- Sinus augmentation (SA) is a common procedure to increase bone volume for dental implants.
- Understanding graft volume changes over time is crucial for predictable outcomes.
- Various biomaterials are used, each with potentially different volumetric stability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the literature on three-dimensional, time-dependent graft volume changes following sinus augmentation.
- To compare volume changes associated with different biomaterials used in SA.
- To assess the impact of graft volume changes on long-term treatment success.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases.
- Inclusion of controlled and uncontrolled studies with >10 SAs and ≥6 months follow-up.
- Assessment of volume changes using computed tomography (CT) or cone beam CT (CBCT).
Main Results:
- Seven controlled and five uncontrolled studies (n=234 SAs) were included, all with a high risk of bias.
- All studies reported augmentation volume reduction (AVR) over time.
- Autogenous bone (AB) showed higher AVR (~45%) compared to bone substitutes (BS) or composite grafts (CG) (~18-22%) within 2 years.
Conclusions:
- Some degree of augmentation volume loss is expected after SA during early healing.
- BS or CG generally exhibit less volume reduction compared to AB.
- Observed augmentation volume loss did not appear to compromise subsequent implant placement or survival.

