Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should we hold the obese responsible? - some key issues.

Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen, Martin Marchman Andersen

    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics : CQ : the International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees
    |July 18, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study examines how responsibility concepts influence public policy on obesity. It differentiates between backward-looking and forward-looking responsibility, impacting healthcare access and societal burden for obesity.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Is Public Health Environmentally Sustainable?

    Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·2025
    Same author

    Ugeskrift for laeger·2023
    Same author

    Blanket Consent and Trust in the Biobanking Context.

    Journal of bioethical inquiry·2022
    Same author

    Are current EU policies on GMOs justified?

    Transgenic research·2019
    Same author

    Property and human genetic information.

    Journal of community genetics·2018
    Same author

    Accelerating the Domestication of New Crops: Feasibility and Approaches.

    Trends in plant science·2017

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Public Health Policy
    • Social Determinants of Health

    Background:

    • Obesity is often viewed as a matter of personal choice and responsibility.
    • Societal compensation is typically denied when individuals are deemed responsible for negative outcomes.
    • Existing policies may not adequately consider nuanced definitions of responsibility.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the moral considerations of public policies on obesity.
    • To differentiate between backward-looking and forward-looking concepts of responsibility.
    • To explore the implications of these concepts on healthcare access for obese individuals.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of responsibility frameworks.
    • Examination of ethical arguments in public policy debates.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study: healthcare access for individuals with obesity.

    • Main Results:

    • Backward-looking responsibility focuses on the cause of a state of affairs.
    • Forward-looking responsibility emphasizes desirable future outcomes, potentially justifying negative appraisals or cost-responsibility.
    • Debates on healthcare access for the obese often utilize forward-looking responsibility arguments.

    Conclusions:

    • Public policies on obesity must carefully consider the ethical implications of different responsibility concepts.
    • Forward-looking responsibility can lead to policies that penalize individuals based on potential future consequences, irrespective of past actions.
    • A nuanced understanding of responsibility is crucial for equitable and effective public health strategies regarding obesity.