Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Published on: August 22, 2018
A simple model of group selection that cannot be analyzed with inclusive fitness
Matthijs van Veelen1, Shishi Luo2, Burton Simon3
1Department of Economics and Business, University of Amsterdam, Roeters straat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, 1 Brattle Square, Suite 6, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Abstract:
A widespread claim in evolutionary theory is that every group selection model can be recast in terms of inclusive fitness. Although there are interesting classes of group selection models for which this is possible, we show that it is not true in general. With a simple set of group selection models, we show two distinct limitations that prevent recasting in terms of inclusive fitness. The first is a limitation across models. We show that if inclusive fitness is to always give the correct prediction, the definition of relatedness needs to change, continuously, along with changes in the parameters of the model. This results in infinitely many different definitions of relatedness - one for every parameter value - which strips relatedness of its meaning. The second limitation is across time. We show that one can find the trajectory for the group selection model by solving a partial differential equation, and that it is mathematically impossible to do this using inclusive fitness.
Related Concept Videos
Inclusive Fitness
Frequency-dependent Selection
Types of Selection
Limits to Natural Selection
Genetic Drift
Modeling with Differential Equations

