Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

09:53
Role of Diffusion MRI Tractography in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
Published on: July 5, 2021
3.3K
Return to play for neurosurgical patients
Rajiv Saigal1, H Hunt Batjer2, Richard G Ellenbogen3
1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
World Neurosurgery
|July 22, 2014
Summary
This study surveyed neurosurgeons on return-to-play decisions for athletes with structural brain and spine injuries. Findings reveal significant differences in return times based on injury type and treatment, informing future guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Sports Medicine
- Trauma Management
Background:
- Sports-related cranial and spine injuries, including concussion, receive significant public and media attention.
- While concussion is well-researched, data on return to play for structural neurosurgical lesions remain limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate current neurosurgical practices regarding return to play for athletes with structural neurosurgical lesions.
- To lay the groundwork for establishing evidence-based guidelines for managing these athletes.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to American Association of Neurological Surgeons members.
- The survey collected data on athletes with operative and nonoperative structural neurosurgical lesions, focusing on return-to-play decisions and outcomes.
- Statistical analysis, including the Mann-Whitney U test, was used to compare return times across different injury types and patient demographics.
Main Results:
- Data from 98 respondents covered 189 athletes (118 surgical, 71 nonoperative).
- Surgical cases showed significant differences in return-to-play timelines: spine (88% ≤6 months) vs. cranial (50% >6 months); noninstrumented spine (55% ≤3 months) vs. instrumented spine (92% >3 months); pediatric (52% >6 months) vs. adult (78% ≤6 months).
- Ninety-four percent of athletes with nonoperative lesions returned to play without sequelae; deficit resolution was required before return for most surgical and non-surgical respondents.
Conclusions:
- This study represents the first investigation into current neurosurgical practices for return to play concerning structural lesions.
- The findings provide an initial basis for developing neurosurgical guidelines for athletes with these specific injuries.

